The evidence on the attitude of 60 cancer out-patients to fibrocolonoscopy carried out under general anesthesia was evaluated versus different procedures of intravenous injection. Most patients were scared prior to examination; 83.3% felt sleepy during the procedure while 85% of those anesthetized wouldn't mind receiving narcosis for repeat examination. Propofol (diprivan) alone showed an advantage over midazolam (dormicum) in being more tolerable and cutting stay at hospital by a third. Ketamin proved undesirable due to psychomimetic effects and delayed regaining of consciousness.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

general anesthesia
8
[use general
4
anesthesia fiber
4
fiber colonoscopy
4
colonoscopy cancer
4
cancer patients]
4
patients] evidence
4
evidence attitude
4
attitude cancer
4
cancer out-patients
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!