Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of a new ultrashort contrast-enhanced (CE) MR angiography (MRA) for the morphologic evaluation of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). The method was compared with conventional X-ray digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and time-of-flight (TOF) MRA in 22 patients to assess the angioarchitecture of the malformations which is essential for treatment planning and follow-up. Two experienced MR readers independently evaluated both techniques with regard to the assessment of feeding arteries, AVM nidus, and venous drainage patterns. Contrast-enhanced MRA was able to detect all AVMs seen on DSA, whereas the TOF MRA failed in 1 patient with a very small AVM. In the assessment of the different vessel components of the AVM there was no difference for the detection and delineation of feeding arteries and the AVM. The venous drainage patterns could always be clearly delineated in the CE MRA, whereas TOF MRA could demonstrate the exact venous drainage in only 9 patients. Contrast-enhanced MRA was found to be superior to conventional TOF MRA in the assessment of the angioarchitecture of cerebral AVMs especially regarding the assessment of the venous drainage patterns. The superiority is supported by the improved vessel-to-background contrast and contrast-to-noise ratios. The major limitations of this new technique consist of a low spatial resolution at the used time resolution which can be improved by further sequence modifications. Contrast-enhanced MRA is thus an important additional imaging technique for treatment planning and follow-up of AVMs.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-002-1418-y | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!