Background: Two basic baseball sliding techniques, feet-first and head-first, are taught at all levels of play. Because of the risk for injury to the upper extremities and the cervical spine during head-first sliding, it is potentially more dangerous than feet-first sliding. There is an assumption among coaches that head-first sliding is more aggressive and faster, but there has been no scientific study to prove this claim.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine which technique provides a faster slide into the base.
Study Design: Controlled field study.
Methods: A total of 60 players ranging from Little League to college level was analyzed. Each athlete was evaluated three times from a standing start at first base to either a head-first or feet-first touch of second base. Each athlete was also timed in a 40-yard sprint and his or her preferred sliding technique was recorded.
Results: We found no statistically significant difference in speed between head-first and feet-first sliding at all levels of play in this study.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03635465020300061301 | DOI Listing |
Sensors (Basel)
March 2019
Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Animal Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Scheldeweg 68, 9090 Melle, Belgium.
Claw lesions and lameness in sows are important problems in the industry as they impair sow welfare and result in economic losses. Available scoring techniques to detect claw lesions are all limited in terms of collecting data during all reproductive phases and recording all claws. The Mobile Claw Scoring Device (MCSD) was designed to address these limitations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Sports Med
August 2017
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Background: Although sliding occurs frequently in professional baseball, little is known about the epidemiology and effect of injuries that occur during sliding in this population of elite athletes.
Purpose: To describe the incidence and characteristics of sliding injuries, determine their effect in terms of time out of play, and identify common injury patterns that may represent appropriate targets for injury prevention programs in the future.
Study Design: Descriptive epidemiologic study.
J Sport Health Sci
September 2016
Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare 4 techniques for arrival at a base after sprinting maximally to reach it: sliding head-first, sliding feet-first, running through the base without slowing, and stopping on the base. A secondary purpose of the study was to determine any advantage there may be to diving into first base to arrive sooner than running through the base.
Methods: Two high-definition video cameras were used to capture 3-dimensional kinematics of sliding techniques of 9 intercollegiate baseball players.
Clin J Sport Med
July 2003
Department of Family Medicine/Sports Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, U.S.A.
Objective: To determine the method of sliding that propels the baseball athlete to the desired base in the shortest amount of time. To assess the athlete's perception of the quickest, safest, and preferred sliding technique.
Design: A single occasion with repeated measures design was used.
Am J Sports Med
March 2003
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555, USA.
Background: Two basic baseball sliding techniques, feet-first and head-first, are taught at all levels of play. Because of the risk for injury to the upper extremities and the cervical spine during head-first sliding, it is potentially more dangerous than feet-first sliding. There is an assumption among coaches that head-first sliding is more aggressive and faster, but there has been no scientific study to prove this claim.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!