A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A pilot study of the effects of transpalatal maxillary advancement on velopharyngeal closure in cleft palate patients. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates whether a transpalatal approach in Le Fort I maxillary advancement affects velopharyngeal function in cleft palate patients.
  • Sixteen patients with maxillary hypoplasia underwent the procedure, and their velopharyngeal function was assessed through speech recordings and nasopharyngoscopy before and after surgery.
  • The results showed no significant changes in function post-operatively, suggesting that this technique does not negatively impact velopharyngeal closure.

Article Abstract

Background And Aims: Impaired velopharyngeal closure function is sometimes a complication of a standard Le Fort I maxillary advancement in cleft palate patients. The transpalatal Le Fort I osteotomy has been suggested as an alternative technique that may avoid this problem. The aim of this pilot study was to examine the effects of the transpalatal approach on velopharyngeal function in a series of cleft palate patients.

Patients: Sixteen consecutive patients with a history of cleft palate exhibiting maxillary hypoplasia who underwent a transpalatal Le Fort I osteotomy.

Methods: All patients had a simultaneous audio/video speech recording and nasopharyngoscopy examination prior to maxillary advancement, followed by a repeat of the same examinations at least 1 year post-operatively. Velopharyngeal function was measured in two ways: by direct observation using nasopharyngoscopy, and indirectly by means of perceptual assessment. Reliability studies of the two measures were performed with satisfactory results.

Results: No statistically significant difference was found between the pre- and post-operative data in either the perceptual speech assessment or nasopharyngoscopy examination.

Conclusion: These results indicate that maxillary advancement by transpalatal Le Fort I osteotomy does not adversely affect velopharyngeal closure function.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/jcms.2002.0319DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

maxillary advancement
16
cleft palate
16
velopharyngeal closure
12
transpalatal fort
12
pilot study
8
effects transpalatal
8
palate patients
8
closure function
8
fort osteotomy
8
velopharyngeal function
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!