We examined the impact of treatment with ramipril versus other angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors on clinical outcome in unselected patients of the prospective multicenter registry Maximal Individual Therapy of Acute Myocardial Infarction PLUS registry (MITRA PLUS). Of 14,608 consecutive patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction, 4.7% received acute therapy with ramipril, 39.0% received other ACE inhibitor therapy, and 56.3% received no ACE inhibitor therapy. In a multivariate analysis, the treatment with ramipril compared with the treatment without ACE inhibitors was associated with a significantly lower hospital mortality and a lower rate of nonfatal major adverse coronary and cerebrovascular events. Compared with other generic ACE inhibitors, ramipril therapy was independently associated with a significantly lower hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32 to 0.90) and a lower rate of nonfatal major adverse coronary and cerebrovascular events (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.93), but not with a lower rate of heart failure at discharge (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.27).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02767-4 | DOI Listing |
Herz
January 2025
Herzzentrum Leipzig, Universitätsklinik für Kardiologie, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death worldwide. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) encompasses a spectrum of diagnoses ranging from unstable angina pectoris to myocardial infarction with and without ST-segment elevation and frequently presents as the first clinical manifestation. It is crucial in this scenario to perform a timely and comprehensive assessment of patients by evaluating the clinical presentation, electrocardiogram and laboratory diagnostics using highly sensitivity cardiac troponin in order to initiate a timely and risk-adapted continuing treatment with immediate or early invasive coronary angiography.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur Heart J
January 2025
Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen DK-2100, Denmark.
Cardiogenic shock represents a critical condition in which the heart is unable to maintain adequate circulation leading to insufficient tissue perfusion and end-organ failure. Temporary mechanical circulatory support offers the potential to stabilize patients, provide a bridge-to-recovery, provide a bridge-to-decision, or facilitate definitive heart replacement therapies. Although randomized controlled trials have been performed in infarct-related cardiogenic shock and refractory cardiac arrest, the optimal timing, appropriate patient selection, and optimal implementation of these devices remain complex and predominantly based on observational data and expert consensus, especially in non-ischaemic shock.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: Despite its low prevalence, premature myocardial infarction (MI) bears serious social consequences and shares different pathophysiology.
Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate young MI patients in terms of clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes.
Patients And Methods: This study is an observational research covering 221 patients <45 years old [16.
J Am Heart Assoc
January 2025
Center for Stroke Research Berlin Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany.
Background: Excessive supraventricular ectopic activity (ESVEA) is regarded as a risk marker for later atrial fibrillation (AF) detection.
Methods And Results: The investigator-initiated, prospective, open, multicenter MonDAFIS (Impact of Standardized Monitoring for Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in Ischemic Stroke) study randomized 3465 patients with acute ischemic stroke without known AF 1:1 to usual diagnostic procedures for AF detection or additive Holter monitoring in hospital for up to 7 days, analyzed in a core laboratory. Secondary study objectives include the comparison of recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction, major bleeding, and all-cause death within 24 months in patients with ESVEA (defined as ectopic supraventricular beats ≥480/day or atrial runs of 10-29 seconds or both) versus patients with newly diagnosed AF versus patients without ESVEA or AF (non-ESVEA/AF), randomized to the intervention group.
Background: Meta-analyses have suggested that the risk of cardiovascular disease events is significantly higher after a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation, but the populations at highest risk have not been well characterized to date.
Methods And Results: The authors analyzed the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) hospitalizations after COPD hospitalization compared with before COPD hospitalization and patient factors associated with ASCVD hospitalizations after COPD hospitalization among 2 high-risk patient cohorts. The primary outcome was risk of an ASCVD hospitalization composite outcome (myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous coronary intervention, stroke, transient ischemic accident) after COPD hospitalization relative to before COPD hospitalization.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!