A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Nonablative remodeling: a 14-month clinical ultrasound imaging and profilometric evaluation of a 1540 nm Er:Glass laser. | LitMetric

Background: Nonablative remodeling has been recently proposed as a new antiaging treatment with no downtime.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nonablative skin remodeling with a 1540 nm Er:glass laser and contact cooling on perioral and periorbital rhytides at 14 months follow-up.

Methods: Forty-two female patients (mean age 47 years), Fitzpatrick skin types I-IV were treated five times at 6-week intervals and checked 6 months after the last treatment. Patients were evaluated using clinical data, patient satisfaction (scale 1-4), digital pictures, ultrasound imaging, and profilometry data from silicone imprints in order to quantify the degree of improvement.

Results: All subjects reported an improvement in the quality and visual aspect of their skin at 6 months (mean patient satisfaction 3.06/4) and at 14 months after enrollment (mean patient satisfaction 2.90/4). This was confirmed by a 43.41% reduction of anisotropy (P < 0.001) 6 weeks after the fourth treatment, reaching 44.85% reduction 6 months after the fifth treatment (P <.001). Ultrasound imaging demonstrated a 17% increase in dermal thickness (P <.001) at 6 months and 11% 6 months after the last treatment (P <.05). A lack of immediate or late adverse effects was noted at all stages of the procedure.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that irradiation with a 1540 nm Er:glass laser emitting in a pulsed mode and coupled with an efficient cooling system increased dermal thickness, reduced the anisotropy of the skin, and improved clinical aspects. The lack of adverse effects within the 14 months confirmed that this procedure was safe. Overall the stability of the results many months after the treatment was remarkable.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.02078.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patient satisfaction
12
nonablative remodeling
8
ultrasound imaging
8
1540 erglass
8
erglass laser
8
months treatment
8
months
5
remodeling 14-month
4
14-month clinical
4
clinical ultrasound
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!