Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@remsenmedia.com&api_key=81853a771c3a3a2c6b2553a65bc33b056f08&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Study Design: Repeat clinical radiograph measurement of kyphosis was performed.
Objectives: To evaluate precision in kyphosis measurement, the presence of intra- and interobserver error, and the effect of endplate selection and curve magnitude on error.
Summary Of Background Data: One study thus far has shown no interobserver difference in readings and an error interval of +/-11 degrees.
Methods: Four experienced examiners measured 30 radiographs of varying angles of kyphosis without preselected end vertebrae twice using the Cobb method.
Results: The mean intraobserver variance was 4.3 degrees (95% confidence interval, +/-9.6 degrees). One examiner had significantly better precision (P= 0.02) than the other examiners, who had no significant difference among them (P = 0.41). This examiner's mean intraobserver difference was 2.3 degrees (95% confidence limit, +/-6.2 degrees ). The 95% confidence limit for the interobserver difference was +/-8.7 degrees. The vertebral error index did not have a rank correlation with precision between readings. Magnitude of curve did not correlate with variance in measurement.
Conclusions: The broad range in intra- and interobserver differences in the measurement of kyphosis should be taken into account in making management decisions or evaluating the success or failure of a treatment program. Careful technique in measurement may allow for improvement in individual precision.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200210010-00013 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!