Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
A sequence variation in the pigment epithelial protein RPE65 has been shown to correlate with RPE65 protein levels, rhodopsin regeneration kinetics and light damage susceptibility in different mouse strains. Here, we tested whether such a correlation can also be found in rats. We examined four rat strains for RPE65 protein levels and the Rpe65 gene sequence. In two strains, we additionally determined Rpe65 mRNA levels, rhodopsin regeneration and light damage susceptibility (LDS).RPE65 protein levels were higher in Lewis and Brown Norway rats compared to Wistar and Long Evans. The albino strains Wistar and Lewis were investigated further. Lewis had higher Rpe65 mRNA levels than Wistar. Sequence analysis of the coding region of the Rpe65 cDNA revealed no relevant sequence variations in the two strains. Content and regeneration of rhodopsin were comparable in both strains. However, Wistar rats were more susceptible to light damage than Lewis. We conclude that lower RPE65 protein levels in Wistar may have been caused by decreased gene expression and not by a sequence variation as suggested for mice. In rats, RPE65 may not be a limiting factor for rhodopsin regeneration. Since LDS in rats did not directly correlate with RPE65 protein levels and rhodopsin regeneration, other yet unidentified (genetic) factors may account for the susceptibility differences observed in rats.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!