Background: The survival in untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is <3 months. Prognosis has improved with chemotherapy, but remains poor. One of the issues concerning current chemotherapy is whether there is any benefit of increasing chemotherapy dose or dose intensity (DI).

Design: In the present review, 20 randomised studies, published in the period 1980-2001, in which dose or DI of chemotherapy in SCLC were the only variables tested, are analysed. The studies were categorised as follows: (i) number of cycles (treatment duration); (ii) dose per cycle; (iii) interval between cycles (dose densification); and (iv) a combination of these variables.

Results: (i) With treatment duration reduced to three to six cycles, median survival time (MST) was 2 months shorter, most evident in patients showing a (complete) response to initial chemotherapy. (ii) An improved survival was observed in two out of five high-dose studies. (iii) Survival was increased by 0.6 to 6.2 months in all four densification studies. (iv) Survival was not improved in studies that used dose-escalation and/or -densification in combination with a reduced number of cycles. The sample sizes were too small to be conclusive in most of the individual trials. The median of the MSTs in the 20 trials taken together was 9.8 months for the standard arms and 11.5 months for the intensified arms (i.e. more cycles, higher dose per cycle and/or shorter intervals). After omitting the two trials with reduced number of cycles in the so-called 'high-dose' arm, the median of MSTs was 8.7 and 11.5 months, respectively. There was only a slight improvement (1%) in 2-year survival for all trials taken together. However, when only taking high-dose and dose-densified chemotherapy trials into account, the difference in median 2-year survival became 19% (12% versus 31%).

Conclusions: The above classification facilitates our understanding about doses of chemotherapy and it makes us appreciate the relevance of the individual determinants. It appears that the number of cycles, dose level, dose density, cumulative dose and DI are all important factors for improving survival. Intensification of chemotherapy still deserves further research in SCLC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdf249DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

small-cell lung
8
lung cancer
8
analysis chemotherapy
4
chemotherapy dose
4
dose dose-intensity
4
dose-intensity small-cell
4
cancer lessons
4
lessons drawn
4
drawn background
4
background survival
4

Similar Publications

Purpose: Meaningful change thresholds are important to help interpret patient-reported outcome scores. To date, meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) thresholds have only been proposed for NSCLC-SAQ total score. This study proposed clinically MWPC thresholds, and group-level minimal important change/difference (MIC/MID) thresholds for both improvement and worsening for the Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer- Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (NSCLC-SAQ) total and symptom scores.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The RELAY-Brain trial examined the clinical utility and survival impacts of ramucirumab (RAM) combined with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-TKI in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases. Although RAM combined with erlotinib (ERL) is known to have clinical benefits, the benefits in patients with baseline brain metastases remain unclear. This report examined the long-term follow-up data (Japan Registry of Clinical Trials: jRCTs2051190027) of the same patients, analyzing relevant biomarkers from tumor and plasma samples.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) remains unclear, particularly for small tumors. This study assesses the survival benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgical resection with a novel focus on tumors less than 1 cm.

Materials And Methods: Data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) was extracted for patients with SCLC (n = 11,962) and LCNEC (n = 6821) who underwent surgical resection between 2004 and 2020.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: We describe the safety of sotorasib monotherapy in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and discuss practical recommendations for managing key risks.

Methods: Incidence rates of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were pooled from 4 clinical trials: CodeBreaK 100 (NCT03600883), CodeBreaK 101 (NCT04185883), CodeBreaK 105 (NCT04380753), and CodeBreaK 200 (NCT04303780) and graded according to CTCAE v5.0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: The pairing of immunotherapy and radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has shown promise. By combining radiotherapy with immunotherapy, the synergistic effects of these modalities not only bolster antitumor efficacy but also exacerbate lung injury. Consequently, developing a model capable of accurately predicting radiotherapy- and immunotherapy-related pneumonitis in lung cancer patients is a pressing need.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!