A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Maxillary ameloblastomas: a review of the literature and of a 15-year database. | LitMetric

Maxillary ameloblastomas: a review of the literature and of a 15-year database.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg

Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

Published: October 2002

Introduction: Cases of maxillary ameloblastomas from 15-year database (1986-2000) collected in the Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery of the University Hospital of Zurich were evaluated.

Patients: Twenty-six patients suffering from ameloblastoma had been collected. Five of them, had a maxillary ameloblastoma, three females and two males.

Methods: A clinical retrospective study was performed. In addition a review of the literature was undertaken and the findings have been compared and contrasted.

Patients: The overall incidence of ameloblastoma within the mandible (21) was four times higher than in the maxilla (5). In 69 per cent of the cases (18) it occurred in men, in 31 percent (8) in women. The sex ratio differed with the maxillary ameloblastomas: 40 percent male (2) and 60 per cent female (3). Although slow growing and nearly painless, it can reach a considerable size within the mid-face involving such highly specialized structures as the orbit, skull-base and brain. Wide resections with a safety margin of healthy bone to prevent local recurrence were undertaken. Nevertheless, recurrence was frequent due to invasion of the adjacent bone.

Conclusion: On the one hand, a recurrence was found after a simple curettage of a 'dental cyst'. On the other hand, extensive bone destruction, involvement of the nasal cavity, the ethmoidal and sphenoidal sinuses, infiltration of the skull-base and distant metastasis were observed. The current treatment of choice is partial maxillectomy with a 10-15 mm safety margin of healthy bone including the alveolar ridge, the hard palate, the mucosa of the maxillary sinus and the lateral nasal wall. For the removal of tumours close to or invading the retromaxillary space the temporal approach gives ample access.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1010-5182(02)90317-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

maxillary ameloblastomas
12
review literature
8
15-year database
8
safety margin
8
margin healthy
8
healthy bone
8
maxillary
5
ameloblastomas review
4
literature 15-year
4
database introduction
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!