Classifications of thoracic and lumbar fractures: rationale and supporting data.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg

Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Published: December 2002

Classification systems are generalizations that attempt to identify common attributes within a group to predict behavior or outcome without sacrificing too much detail. Because of the inherent variability of fractures, classifying them can be difficult. To properly apply any of the commonly cited classification schemes for thoracic and lumbar fractures, one must not only know the injury categories described in the original studies but also be familiar with the rationale for developing the classification. Many original reports describing common thoracic and lumbar injury classifications lack a rigorous scientific foundation. They were based largely on the insights of experienced surgeons and researchers. Although the ideal classification for thoracic and lumbar fractures does not exist, it would incorporate neurologic as well as structural factors. Standardization of terminology as related to treatment decisions and prognosis is key to an improved understanding of the clinical behavior of these injuries and identification of optimal treatment options.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200209000-00008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

thoracic lumbar
16
lumbar fractures
12
classifications thoracic
4
lumbar
4
fractures
4
fractures rationale
4
rationale supporting
4
supporting data
4
classification
4
data classification
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!