Comparison of contrast-enhanced breath-hold and free-breathing respiratory-gated imaging in three-dimensional magnetic resonance coronary angiography.

Suppression of respiratory motion is one of the major challenges of magnetic resonance (MR) coronary angiography. Two approaches to compensate for respiratory motion have often been proposed: breath-hold (BH) and free-breathing respiratory-gated (FBRG) imaging. So far, however, these approaches have never been directly compared. MR coronary angiography was performed in 32 patients with suspected coronary artery disease. MR data were acquired using contrast-enhanced BH and FBRG 3-dimensional MR coronary angiographic techniques. MR images were compared with regard to image quality using quantitative parameters and with regard to accuracy for stenosis detection in the proximal and mid-coronary segments in comparison to x-ray angiography. With regard to image quality, BH was superior to FBRG. Signal-to-noise ratio was 29.1 +/- 10.7 for BH versus 18.8 +/- 9.7 for FBRG (p <0.05) and contrast-to-noise was 18.0 +/- 7.4 for BH versus 11.3 +/- 7.9 for FBRG (p

Download full-text PDF	Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02598-5	DOI Listing