A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Does pancreaticosplenectomy contribute to better survival? | LitMetric

Background/aims: This study was conducted to clarify the impact of pancreaticosplenectomy on the prognosis of patients with gastric carcinoma.

Methodology: Two hundred and seventy-two patients who underwent total gastrectomy with distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy were retrospectively reviewed.

Results: Lymph node metastases at the splenic hilum (#10) and along the splenic artery (#11) occurred in 12.4% and 19.2% of cases, respectively. The 5-year survival rate of those without metastasis at #10 was 62.8%. Once nodal metastasis occurred, the prognosis became very poor; only 18.2% in those with a single positive node and 15.4% of those with two or more positive nodes at this location survived 5 years. Similar trends in survival were observed with respect to nodes at #11. When stratified by nodal status as currently determined by microscopic examination, pancreaticosplenectomy saved 4.5% of patients with positive nodes, but was insufficient in 17.3% of cases and was not necessary in the 78.2% of cases who were node negative at these locations.

Conclusions: The data indicate that pancreaticosplenectomy can save some patients with positive nodes in these regions; however, the small survival benefit does not provide a basis for the general application of this highly morbid procedure. To further evaluate these results in a randomized study, selection of a subset of patients who are likely to have metastasis is the key.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

positive nodes
12
patients positive
8
patients
5
pancreaticosplenectomy
4
pancreaticosplenectomy contribute
4
contribute better
4
better survival?
4
survival? background/aims
4
background/aims study
4
study conducted
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!