We are developing a new spinal implant system (SIS) without fusion (bone graft). This SIS is made from two materials, metal and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) polymer. The Food and Drug Administration recommended testing in vivo, in an animal model, whether the PEEK polymer could be used in a SIS without any harm of wear debris to the nervous tissue (spinal cord and nerve roots). The objective was to evaluate the biological response of the spinal cord and nerve roots (dura mater) to PEEK polymer particles. Twenty-four female New Zealand white rabbits were used. The rabbits were divided into three groups: test (n = 12), control (n = 9), and sham (n = 3). During the surgery, the test group received the PEEK particle injections (5 x 10(7) particles per site, lumbar and thoracic), while the control group received only the vehicle (0.9% saline solution). The sham group had the same surgical approach without injection. In each group, the rabbits were euthanized at 1, 4, and 12 weeks postsurgery. The macroscopic and semiquantitative histologic analyses of the spinal cords (dura mater) showed normal vascularization and particle adherence to the connective tissue especially at the injection sites. Neither necrosis nor swelling of the dura mater and nerve roots was observed. The PEEK polymer is harmless to the spinal cord; thus it might be used as component in the spinal implant system.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10159 | DOI Listing |
Polymers (Basel)
January 2025
Centre for Nanomaterials and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, University of Jan Evangelista Purkyně, Pasteurova 15, 400 96 Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic.
Surface modification of various polymer foils was achieved by UV activation and chemical grafting with cysteamine to improve surface properties and antimicrobial efficacy. UVC activation at 254 nm led to changes in surface wettability and charge density, which allowed the introduction of amino and thiol functional groups by cysteamine grafting. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) confirmed increased nitrogen and sulfur content on the modified surfaces.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMaterials (Basel)
January 2025
DENS-ia Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, Miguel de Cervantes European University, C/del Padre Julio Chevalier 2, 47012 Valladolid, Spain.
A comparative analysis has been carried out between three different dental materials suitable for the prostheses manufacturing. The analysis performed is based on the finite elements method (FEM) and was made to evaluate their performance under three different loading conditions. Three different materials were modeled with 3D CAD geometry, all of them suitable to be simulated by means of a linear elastic model.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
January 2025
School of Pharmacy, Medical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is widely used in orthopedic and dental implants due to its excellent mechanical properties, chemical stability, and biocompatibility. However, its inherently bioinert nature makes it present weak osteogenic activity, which greatly restricts its clinical adoption. Herein, strontium (Sr) is incorporated onto the surface of PEEK using mussel-inspired polydopamine coating to improve its osteogenic activity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater
February 2025
Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
While polyetherketoneketone is a high-performance thermoplastic polymer, its hydrophobicity and inertness limit bone adhesion. This study aimed to evaluate a novel PEKK/CaSiO/TeO nanocomposite, comparing it to PEKK/15 wt.% CaSiO and PEKK groups.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFACS Biomater Sci Eng
January 2025
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio 44115, United States.
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a high-performance polymer material for developing varying orthopedic, spine, cranial, maxillofacial, and dental implants. Despite their commendable mechanical properties and biocompatibility, the major limitation of PEEK implants is their low affinity to osseointegrate with the neighboring bone. Over the last two decades, several efforts have been made to incorporate bioactive components such as bioceramic particles in PEEK to enhance its osseointegration capacity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!