The objective of this study was to investigate the effects on the pharmacodynamics and noncompartmental pharmacokinetics after weekly subcutaneous administration of novel formulations of cetrorelix acetate in healthy men. In a randomized parallel-group study, single subcutaneous doses of cetrorelix acetate (concentration: 2.5 mg peptide base/ml) dissolved in aqueous gluconic acid (CET/glu, dose: 5 or 10 mg peptide base) or in water (CET/wat, dose: 10 mg peptide base) were given to 36 subjects once weekly in the morning for 4 weeks. Cetrorelix plasma, serum testosterone, luteinizing hormone, andfollicle-stimulating hormone concentrations were monitored after each administration for 1 week, with extensive profiling after the first and fourth administration. Cetrorelix plasma concentrations were analyzed by radioimmunoassay and serum hormone concentrations by enzyme immunoassays. At least half-maximum testosterone suppression started with all treatments within less than 1 day. Deepest and longest testosterone suppression was achieved by 10 mg CET/glu. Duration of atleasthalf-maximum suppression was after the first dose median of 82 hours and after the fourth dose median of 122 hours, respectively. Substantial suppression was also evidentfor luteinizing hormone (LH) and, to a lesser extent, forfollicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). On average, Cmax was nearly doubled after single and multiple doses, and AUC(tau) was increased by about 50% after single doses and about 30% after multiple doses of 10 mg CET/glu as compared to 10 mg CET/wat. For tmax and t1/2, no significant differences were found between formulations. It was concluded that testosterone suppression increased with weekly subcutaneous administrations of 10 mg CET/glu. Compared to CET/wat, bioavailability and duration of suppression were increased with CET/glu.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Gen Comp Endocrinol
December 2024
University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Animal Science, Lincoln, NE 68583-0908, United States. Electronic address:
The second form of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH-II) and its receptor (GnRHR-II) are abundantly produced within the porcine testis and immunolocalize within the seminiferous tubules, suggesting a role in spermatogenesis and/or sperm function. The objective of this study was to quantify GnRH-II and GnRHR-II abundance within boar reproductive tract tissues and examine their role in porcine sperm function. Immunoblotting revealed GnRHR-II abundance was 12-fold greater (P < 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFF S Sci
October 2024
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address:
Objective: To use murine avatars for studying human endometriotic lesion response to 2 different hormonal regimens to determine whether progesterone receptor (PR) can prospectively predict response to progestin-based therapy. Endometriosis is a chronic gynecologic disease afflicting 1-in-10 reproductive-age women; however response to medical therapy is highly variable because endometriotic lesions do not consistently respond to first-line progestin-based therapy. We have previously demonstrated in a retrospective study that PR status in lesions is correlated with response to progestins.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBull Exp Biol Med
August 2024
Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Reprod Med Biol
September 2024
IBM Japan Ltd. Tokyo Japan.
Purpose: Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) is vital for IVF. We have developed an AI system to support the implementation of COS protocols in our clinical group.
Methods: We developed two models as AI algorithms of the AI system.
Hum Reprod
October 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkiye.
Study Question: Does medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) exposure in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) cycles cause molecular perturbations in the steroidogenic function and gonadotropin responsiveness of the granulosa cells?
Summary Answer: PPOS cycles are identical to traditional GnRH antagonist cycles not only for clinical IVF characteristics but also for gonadotropin receptor expression, response to gonadotropins, and steroidogenic function at the molecular level.
What Is Known Already: PPOS is increasingly used as an alternative to GnRH antagonists due to the inhibitory effect of progesterone on LH release by reducing GnRH pulsatility at the hypothalamic level. Although a growing body of evidence from clinical studies did not indicate significant differences between PPOS and antagonist protocols for IVF cycle characteristics and obstetrical outcomes, it is still unknown whether exposure of the antral follicle cohort to progesterone or its synthetic derivatives during ovarian stimulation causes any subtle molecular aberrations in terms of steroidogenesis and gonadotropin responsiveness.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!