A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Evaluation of a district-wide screening programme for diabetic retinopathy utilizing trained optometrists using slit-lamp and Volk lenses. | LitMetric

Background: Debate exists about the optimum way to screen for diabetic retinopathy. Cameras produce a permanent record, but offer patients less choice about when and where to be screened. Optometrists offer flexibility but sensitivity and specificity of schemes have varied considerably, perhaps because of variability in screening methodology and that there is frequently no quality assurance programme.

Aims: To audit our district-wide (population 340000) screening programme for diabetic retinopathy against national targets: sensitivity > 80%, specificity > 95% and referral to review < 3 months.

Methods: Trained optometrists performed slit-lamp examination with Volk lenses (78 dioptre) with standardized reporting. Audit was by ophthalmologist with slit-lamp and Volk lenses through dilated pupils.

Results: We examined 872 eyes of 439 patients; 64% were normal, 29% background diabetic retinopathy, 7% sight-threatening eye disease (STED). Sixty-three percent of patients were seen within 6 months of the original screen. Of these, sensitivity for any retinopathy was 72%, specificity 77%, positive predictive value (PPV) 53%, negative predictive value (NPV) 88%. For STED, in this group, sensitivity was 87% and specificity 91%, PPV 30%, NPV 99%. Median interval referral to ophthalmological review was 11.5 weeks with 73% reviewed in under the 13-week target. Of those referred 25% received laser therapy. Eleven patients found to have referable eye disease at their initial screen were not referred to an ophthalmologist by their GP.

Conclusions: We conclude that effective district-wide screening for diabetic retinopathy by optometrists using slit-lamp and Volk lenses is possible; however, only 36% of identified people with diabetes in the district were screened over a 4-year period.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00677.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diabetic retinopathy
20
volk lenses
16
slit-lamp volk
12
district-wide screening
8
screening programme
8
programme diabetic
8
trained optometrists
8
optometrists slit-lamp
8
eye disease
8
retinopathy
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!