Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of feedback to medical staff in reducing inappropriate hospital days, particularly those attributable to conservative medical discharge policies.

Design: Quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test with non-equivalent control group.

Setting: A publicly funded hospital in industrial belt in Barcelona (Spain), serving a predominantly urban population of 100,000.

Study Participants: Two non-equivalent groups: control group (surgery department) and intervention group (internal medicine department).

Intervention: Meetings between hospital management and medical staff of the intervention group to inform clinicians of percentages and reasons for inappropriate stays in their departments.

Main Outcome Measures: Total inappropriate hospital days and percentage attributable to physicians, measured with the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol before, during, and after intervention.

Results: There were no relevant differences in the characteristics of the populations whose stays were reviewed during each of the periods. The total number of inappropriate stays and the percentage attributable to the doctor in the control group did not show any differences between the periods. In the intervention group, inappropriate stays attributable to the doctor decreased from 35.9% in the period to intervention to 27.7% during intervention (relative drop of 22.8%; P < 0.01), and rose to 32.7% after intervention. Differences in total inappropriate days were not significant.

Conclusions: Providing physicians with feedback about percentage of inappropriate hospital days produced a significant reduction in the number of inappropriate stays attributable to the doctor, although the impact on overall inappropriate stays is inconclusive.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/14.4.305DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

inappropriate stays
20
inappropriate hospital
12
hospital days
12
intervention group
12
attributable doctor
12
inappropriate
10
effectiveness feedback
8
reducing inappropriate
8
medical staff
8
control group
8

Similar Publications

The effectiveness of tumescent anesthesia in managing pain for enzymatic debridement of burns. A case-control study.

Burns

December 2024

Burn & Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery,Azienda Ospedaliera Cannizzaro, Via Messina 829, Catania, Italy.

Introduction: Burn injuries are a global health challenge, causing significant pain, tissue damage and complex wound management issues. Traditional treatments like surgical debridement, while effective, pose challenges such as blood loss, grafting requirements, and prolonged hospital stays. Enzymatic debridement, such as the Nexobrid procedure, effectively removes necrotic tissue but can be painful for patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Evaluating academic detailing as an antibiotic stewardship intervention in primary healthcare settings in Croatia.

BMC Prim Care

December 2024

Department of Endocrinology, University hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia, and School of Medicine, and University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

Background: Acute respiratory tract infections are common in primary healthcare care settings and frequently result in antibiotic prescriptions, despite being primarily viral. There is scarcity of research examining impact of academic detailing (AD) intervention on prescribing practices for these infections in resource-constrained healthcare settings like southeastern Europe. Therefore aim of this study was to evaluate impact of AD intervention as an antimicrobial stewardship measure on antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections in primary setting in Croatia which is located in southeastern Europe.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background & Problems: Inappropriate urinary catheter use not only prolongs the length of hospital stays but is also associated with increased rates of mortality. The incidence rate of inappropriate urinary catheter use in our unit was as high as 44.6%, and the incidence density of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) was 3.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims Of The Study: Physicians frequently prescribe antipsychotics off-label to treat, among others, insomnia and anxiety. The Swiss "smarter medicine - Choosing Wisely" campaign has tried to raise awareness about the risks and to limit benzodiazepine and Z-drug prescriptions. In the Italian-speaking part of Switzerland, our network of public hospitals joined the campaign with the aim of avoiding unnecessary benzodiazepine and Z-drug treatments, with prescription monitoring, benchmarking and educational contributions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Impact of antibiotic changes on hospital stay and treatment duration in community-acquired pneumonia.

Sci Rep

September 2024

Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 82, Gumi-ro 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, Republic of Korea.

Article Synopsis
  • * Conducted at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from 2017 to 2021, the retrospective study involved analyzing 436 CAP patients’ antibiotic prescriptions against established guidelines and examining clinical outcomes.
  • * Results indicated that over 55% of patients experienced changes to their antibiotic treatment, with inappropriate prescriptions linked to extended hospital stays and longer treatment durations, highlighting the need for better initial antibiotic choices.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!