Severity: Warning
Message: fopen(/var/lib/php/sessions/ci_sessionp847e9dfctvhhgpqing96e2mon36ku9d): Failed to open stream: No space left on device
Filename: drivers/Session_files_driver.php
Line Number: 177
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Severity: Warning
Message: session_start(): Failed to read session data: user (path: /var/lib/php/sessions)
Filename: Session/Session.php
Line Number: 137
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3145
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Contemporary studies and observations have left no doubt that occlusive dressings are superior to open treatment after laser resurfacing. The currently available occlusive dressings, however, are time-consuming to apply, often dislodge shortly after application, and most require reapplication. The authors report a cross-sectional observational study of patients who were treated with a new dual silicone-based dressing (DiamondSeal) after full-face laser resurfacing, with or without rhytidectomy. Patients who previously underwent similar surgeries and who were treated with a popular occlusive tape dressing (Flexzan) acted as historic controls. A combination of two silicones produced a gel-like silicone admixture that was spread evenly over the laser-treated areas. The silicone gel solidified into a flexible membrane and remained on the patient's face for 5 days. Questionnaires were sent to patients who were treated with the silicone dressing and those who were treated with a currently popular occlusive dressing. When the attributes of these dressings were compared, the superiority of the silicone dressing approached statistical significance ( = 0.08). The majority of patients treated with the silicone dressing (71 percent) had a positive experience with this dressing, stating they would repeat the experience if necessary. Only 54 percent of patients with a tape dressing were willing to repeat their experience ( = 0.18). The major advantages of this dressing, noted from the surgeon's perspective, were the speed with which the mask was applied; the ease of application, without the need for templates; the acceptable cure duration, allowing spontaneous contouring of the silicone along facial contours; the simple tailoring of the dressing; the reduced need for and minimal time for reapplication; and the paucity of complications.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000021884.52700.B2 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!