AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess the frequency and severity of adverse events (AEs) and treatment interruptions (TI) among HIV-infected individuals using efavirenz, particularly focusing on those with a high history of intravenous drug use (IVDU).
  • Approximately 29.3% of the 1,033 patients experienced AEs, with central nervous system (CNS) issues being the most common; however, most AEs were mild and led to only a small percentage (8.23%) needing treatment interruption.
  • Overall, efavirenz is considered safe and well-tolerated, even among high-risk populations, with CNS disturbances being the primary concern but not severe enough to warrant significant treatment stoppage.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) and treatment interruption (TI) with efavirenz in a population with a high rate of intravenous drug use (IVDU).

Method: This was a national, multicenter, and observational study of HIV-infected adult patients who were starting an efavirenz-containing regimen. Evaluations of AEs were made in routine clinical practice at baseline and at least 3 months later. A total of 1,033 patients were included from 60 participating hospitals; 20% were antiretroviral naive. The risk factor for HIV infection was IVDU in 62.3%, and 6.6% of participants were on methadone.

Results: AEs affected 29.3% of participants, and treatment was interrupted in 8.23%. The most frequent AEs were CNS disturbances that affected 24.1% participants; these AEs were considered related to efavirenz in 18.5% patients. AEs were not severe, and treatment had to be interrupted in 6% of patients. Other AEs were cutaneous rash (incidence of 5.9%; 2.4% of TI), gastrointestinal disturbances (1.45%; no TI), and elevation of liver function test (0.68%; no TI). Patients taking methadone had more AEs (39.7%), mainly CNS disturbances, and TI (19.1%). Cutaneous rash was more frequent among women. Psychoactive drug consumption, previous history of psychiatric disorders, antiretroviral experience, or previous nevirapine intolerance were not associated with higher incidence of AEs.

Conclusion: Safety and tolerance of efavirenz is good in most patients, even in a population with a high rate of IVDU. The most common AEs are CNS disturbances; they are not severe and rarely lead to TI.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1310/3q91-yt2d-but4-8hn6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cns disturbances
12
aes
9
safety tolerance
8
tolerance efavirenz
8
national multicenter
8
population high
8
high rate
8
treatment interrupted
8
aes cns
8
patients aes
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!