Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Three alternatives of surgical treatment for acute cholescystitis were studied. The 40 patients integrating Group I were studied in a retrospective way and received conservative medical treatment and deferred conventional surgery. The 40 patients integrating Group II were studied in a prospective way and they were operated according to conventional technique 72 hours before the beginning of the acute vesicular condition. The 40 patients integrating Group III were studied in a prospective way and they were operated using laparoscopic technique. The operation time, fall of temperature, the removal of the nasogastric tube, the postoperative pain, the oral tolerance and the postoperative hospitalization time were compared. We find out that there is a significant difference between all the aforementioned parameters and, particularly, between the conventional technique and the laparoscopic technique.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!