A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Bronchial obstruction in asthmatic patients is underestimated by general practice physicians]. | LitMetric

[Bronchial obstruction in asthmatic patients is underestimated by general practice physicians].

Presse Med

Département des maladies respiratoires, Hôpital Sainte Marguerite, BP 29, 13274 Marseille, France.

Published: June 2002

Introduction: Many asthmatics have few or no symptoms despite severe obstruction of the airways. Physicians confronted with this phenomenon may therefore underrate the severity of the asthma and treatment may be insufficient. We studied the capacity of a group of general practitioners to assess the bronchial obstruction of patients presenting with varying degrees of symptoms and obstruction.

Methods: Ten asthmatics were initially examined by a pneumologist. The patients were classified as: normal (N; no dyspnoea, no wheeze, normal spirometry; n = 2); abnormal (A; dyspnoea and whistling, bronchial obstruction; n = 4); falsely normal (FN; mild or no dyspnoea and no wheeze, bronchial obstruction; n = 4). Ten randomly selected general practitioners, ignoring the protocol and aim of the study, examined 6 patients, 2 from each category. They then had to choose from a list of antiasthma treatments, those that would be appropriate for each patient, and assess on a visual analog scale (VAS) the degree of respiratory tract obstruction at the time of examination. Finally, questions on their knowledge and approach to asthma were asked.

Results: The VAS assessments (mm) were of 15.6, 65.2 and 11.0 in the FN, A and N patients, corresponding to a maximum expiratory volume per second of 52, 51 and 98% of the predicted values. Dyspnoea and wheeze were mentioned by each physician as criteria for respiratory tract obstruction. Although they also mentioned the laboured breathing, none noted the signs of thoracic distension, present in the falsely normal patients. None used the paradoxical pulse (inspiratory drop in systolic pressure) and/or spirometric measurements; nobody had noted that dyspnoea and wheeze can be lacking despite substantial obstruction of the airways. Five had prescribed beta 2 agonists alone, without corticosteroid therapy in falsely normal patients.

Conclusion: General practitioners may underrate the severity of asthma, despite substantial obstruction of the respiratory tract, if there are few symptoms and hence under-treat falsely normal patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dyspnoea wheeze
16
falsely normal
16
general practitioners
12
bronchial obstruction
12
respiratory tract
12
obstruction
8
obstruction airways
8
underrate severity
8
severity asthma
8
tract obstruction
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!