A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3145
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Intratidal compliance-volume curve as an alternative basis to adjust positive end-expiratory pressure: a study in isolated perfused rabbit lungs. | LitMetric

Objective: Repeated collapse and reopening of alveoli have been shown to aggravate lung injury, which could be prevented by positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Yet, how to adjust optimum PEEP is a matter of debate. We suggest a new strategy to adjust PEEP, which is based on the analysis of the intratidal compliance-volume curve. This approach was compared with a strategy based on the static pressure-volume curve. Furthermore, two other ventilator settings were investigated. One served as a negative control likely to provoke atelectasis, and the other was expected to induce overdistension.

Design: Prospective, randomized block design.

Setting: Laboratory.

Subjects: Isolated, perfused, and ventilated rabbit lungs.

Interventions: Tidal volumes of 8 mL/kg of body weight were used throughout. After stabilization, the lungs were randomized to one of four protocols (lasting 120 mins; n = 6 per group). Group 1 was ventilated at zero end-expiratory pressure. In group 2, PEEP was set above the lower inflection point of the static pressure-volume curve. In group 3, adjustment of PEEP was based on the intratidal compliance-volume curve, as determined by the slice method. In group 4, increasing PEEP levels ensured a plateau airway pressure of 20-25 cm H2O likely to provoke overdistension.

Measurements And Main Results: The ventilation/perfusion (VA/Q) distribution was analyzed by the multiple inert gas elimination technique. Alveolar derecruitment was indicated by shunt and low VA/Q areas as observed in group 1. In groups 2 and 3, VA/Q data initially indicated full recruitment. In contrast to group 3, shunt increased in group 2 near completion of the experiments. Group 4 showed complete recruitment, but the VA/Q distribution included high VA/Q areas.

Conclusions: The intratidal compliance-volume curve represents a rational basis for adjusting PEEP in the isolated lung model. Because this strategy does not require invasive measures and facilitates continuous assessment of ventilator settings, it may be of clinical interest.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200207000-00032DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intratidal compliance-volume
16
compliance-volume curve
16
end-expiratory pressure
12
group
9
positive end-expiratory
8
isolated perfused
8
peep based
8
static pressure-volume
8
pressure-volume curve
8
ventilator settings
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!