Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The Ped gene influences the rate of cleavage of preimplantation embryos and their subsequent survival. Embryos that express the product of the Ped gene, Qa-2 protein, cleave at a faster rate than embryos with an absence of Qa-2 protein. In addition, the Ped gene has pleiotropic effects on reproduction. Thus, there is a reproductive advantage to those mouse strains that are Qa-2 positive. The presence or absence of Qa-2 is reflected at the DNA level by the presence or absence (deletion polymorphism) of the gene(s) encoding Qa-2 protein. Many inbred and wild-derived mouse strains have been characterized as Qa-2 positive or negative, but no previous studies have looked at the distribution of the Ped gene in a population of free-living wild mice. The purpose of this study was to determine the Ped gene deletion polymorphism frequency in a sample of free-living wild mice. Twenty-nine mice were collected and identified as Mus musculus. Genomic DNA extraction was performed on tail tips, and PCR was used to amplify a region from the Ped gene. Known Qa-2 positive and negative mice were used as controls. Results showed that all 29 wild mice were positive for the Ped gene. Since the Ped gene is dominant and provides a reproductive advantage, it is not surprising that all of the wild mice were Qa-2 positive. However, our assay could not distinguish homozygous from heterozygous mice. It is possible that the Qa-2 deletion polymorphism is segregating in the population, and a larger sample size would identify some Qa-2 negative mice.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jez.10117 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!