The discovery of nephrouroameba: was it real or not?

Am J Nephrol

Division of Nephrology, University of Messina, C.da Conte Coop. Sperone, Is. 3 pal. E, I-98168 Messina, Italy.

Published: July 2002

In 1938 Procaccini showed scientific interest in a new kind of ameba, and called it "nephrouroameba" from which the disease "nephrouroamebiasis" is derived. He wrote a paper titled "La Nefrouroamoebiasi" thus describing its history, the biopathogenetic evolutionary cycle of the protozoon, its therapeutic, epidemiological, anatomo-biological, diagnostic, cultural, biological and morphological features. Between 1934 and 1939, Procaccini had the opportunity to follow many patients belonging to a group of Italian soldiers serving in the Eastern Italian Army in Ethiopia. At that time he was responsible for the biopathological laboratory. After a short preclinical stage of fatigue, patients suffering from nephrouroamebiasis showed a nephrotic syndrome with gross hematuria. The symptoms ceased within a few days but residual microhematuria, albuminuria and urine casts persisted for many months. After microscopic observation, he reproduced some protozoons and classified them as a kind of ameba. Critical analysis of his report leads to the morphological identification of Trichomonas, thus excluding his classification as nephrouroamebas.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000063772DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

kind ameba
8
discovery nephrouroameba
4
nephrouroameba real
4
real not?
4
not? 1938
4
1938 procaccini
4
procaccini scientific
4
scientific interest
4
interest kind
4
ameba called
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!