Electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions (EEOAEs) can be elicited from the chicken inner ear. Since lesion studies implicate hair cells are the source of EEOAEs, we hypothesized that acoustic stimuli would modulate EEOAE amplitude at cochlear locations where the acoustic and electrical stimuli overlap. To assess this interaction, EEOAEs were measured as the frequency and amplitude of the acoustic stimuli were varied. EEOAEs, evoked by AC current (3-250 microA rms) delivered to the round window had a broad band pass response (1-6 kHz) with a peak between 3 and 4 kHz and maximum amplitude of 27 dB SPL. EEOAE suppression/enhancement tuning curves were measured at 2, 3, 4 and 6 kHz by varying the frequency of a 70 dB SPL tone and measuring the change in EEOAE amplitude. EEOAE tuning curves were characterized by a tip; a narrow range of frequencies where EEOAE amplitude was suppressed by as much as 5 dB, and by sidebands, a range of frequencies above and below the tip where EEOAE amplitude was enhanced by as much as 1.5 dB. The best suppression frequency, or characteristic frequency, was close to the frequency of the EEOAE elicited by the 3- or 4-kHz electric stimulus. However, the characteristic frequency was displaced towards higher frequencies for the 2-kHz electric stimulus, and towards lower frequencies for the 6-kHz electric stimulus. EEOAE suppression increased approximately linearly with acoustic level. These results suggest that EEOAEs evoked by round window stimulation are predominantly generated by hair cells near the 3- to 4-kHz region of the cochlea.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000063737 | DOI Listing |
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol
December 2005
Kresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0506, USA.
Electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions (EEOAEs) are sounds measured in the ear canal when alternating current (AC) stimulation is passed into the cochlea. These sounds are attributed to the motile responses of outer hair cells (OHCs). The EEOAE has characteristic amplitude, phase, and fine structure.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Assoc Res Otolaryngol
June 2002
Lehrstuhl für Zoologie, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany.
Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) are accepted as being indicators of an active process in the inner ear and have been observed in all groups of land vertebrates. Previous studies have indicated that there may be more than one cellular substrate driving the active processes in different groups of vertebrates. To investigate the cellular substrate in non-mammals and to relate the findings to studies in mammalian ears, we injected AC and DC currents of amplitudes generally below 5 microA into scala media of the bobtail skink Tiliqua rugosa and recorded their influences on SOAEs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAudiol Neurootol
September 2002
Hearing Research Lab, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.
Electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions (EEOAEs) can be elicited from the chicken inner ear. Since lesion studies implicate hair cells are the source of EEOAEs, we hypothesized that acoustic stimuli would modulate EEOAE amplitude at cochlear locations where the acoustic and electrical stimuli overlap. To assess this interaction, EEOAEs were measured as the frequency and amplitude of the acoustic stimuli were varied.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Acoust Soc Am
June 2002
Department of Physiology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.
It was shown previously that electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions (EEOAEs) can be amplitude modulated by low-frequency bias tones and enhanced by application of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to scala media. These effects were attributed, respectively, to the mechano-electrical transduction (MET) channels and ATP-gated ion channels on outer hair cell (OHC) stereocilia, two conductance pathways that appear to be functionally independent and additive in their effects on ionic current through the OHC. In the experiments described here, the separate influences of ATP and MET channel bias on EEOAEs did not combine linearly.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHear Res
November 2001
The Auditory Laboratory, Department of Physiology, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6097, Australia.
Stimulation of the cochlea with alternating current produces sound in the ear canal. These electrically evoked oto-acoustic emissions (EEOAEs) are attributed to electro-motility of outer hair cells (OHCs). Earlier work suggested EEOAEs were sensitive to the open probability of OHC mechano-electrical transduction (MET) channels.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!