[Studies of marker screening efficiency and corresponding influencing factors in QTL composite interval mapping].

Screening markers efficiently is the foundation of mapping QTLs by composite interval mapping. Main and interaction markers distinguished, besides using background control for genetic variation, could also be used to construct intervals of two-way searching for mapping QTLs with epistasis, which can save a lot of calculation time. Therefore, the efficiency of marker screening would affect power and precision of QTL mapping. A doubled haploid population with 200 individuals and 5 chromosomes was constructed, with 50 markers evenly distributed at 10 cM space. Among a total of 6 QTLs, one was placed on chromosome I, two linked on chromosome II, and the other three linked on chromosome IV. QTL setting included additive effects and epistatic effects of additive x additive, the corresponding QTL interaction effects were set if data were collected under multiple environments. The heritability was assumed to be 0.5 if no special declaration. The power of marker screening by stepwise regression, forward regression, and three methods for random effect prediction, e.g. best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP), linear unbiased prediction (LUP) and adjusted unbiased prediction (AUP), was studied and compared through 100 Monte Carlo simulations. The results indicated that the marker screening power by stepwise regression at 0.1, 0.05 and 0.01 significant level changed from 2% to 68%, the power changed from 2% to 72% by forward regression. The larger the QTL effects, the higher the marker screening power. While the power of marker screening by three random effect prediction was very low, the maximum was only 13%. That suggested that regression methods were much better than those by using the approaches of random effect prediction to identify efficient markers flanking QTLs, and forward selection method was more simple and efficient. The results of simulation study on heritability showed that heightening of both general heritability and interaction heritability of genotype x environments could enhance marker screening power, the former had a greater influence on QTLs with larger main and/or epistatic effects, while the later on QTLs with small main and/or epistatic effects. The simulation of 100 times was also conducted to study the influence of different marker number and density on marker screening power. It is indicated that the marker screening power would decrease if there were too many markers, especially with high density in a mapping population, which suggested that a mapping population with definite individuals could only hold limited markers. According to the simulation study, the reasonable number of markers should not be more than individuals. The simulation study of marker screening under multiple environments showed high total power of marker screening. In order to relieve the problem that marker screening power restricted the efficiency of QTL mapping, markers identified in multiple environments could be used to construct two search intervals.