Introduction And Objectives: To present our experience with Hydroflex and Dynaflex self-contained inflatable penile prosthesis.
Material And Methods: Between october 1988 and december 2000 a total of 63 men underwent implantation of 8 Hydroflex and 55 Dynaflex penile prosthesis. The follow-up period ranged from 12 and 127 months (mean 54.5).
Results: A total of 124 cylinders were implanted (in 2 cases only 1 cylinder was implanted). During implantation 3 corpora cavernosun ruptures were present, but implantation was possible in 2. Specific complication rates after implantation were as follow: early infection, 3 patients (4.7%); late infection, 1 patient (1.6%); pain that needed readmission 2 cases (3.2%); mechanical device failure, 7 cylinders in 6 men (mean time 83.5 months). 7 men (11.1%) needed prolonged teaching time to operate the prosthesis. Only 6 men (9.5%) wer dissatisfied with the prosthesis. It was possible to change only 1 cylinder when needed.
Conclusions: Self-contained inflatable prosthesis brings good results on long time use. The mechanical malfunction rate is low and it is possible to change only one cylinder if needed. An important number of patients need intensive and prolonged teaching time to obtain a successful result.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0210-4806(02)72770-8 | DOI Listing |
Arch Ital Urol Androl
December 2020
Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University, Roma.
Objective: Penile Prosthetic Surgery is already well characterized but the problems connected with possible complications still need to be evaluated and discussed.
Material And Methods: The Authors revaluated their experience in Penile Prosthetic Surgery involving 577 patients (18 - 86 years, mean age 51.3 years) operated by the same surgeon since 1984.
Actas Urol Esp
April 2002
Unidad de Andrología, Servicio de Urología, Ciudad Sanitaria y Unversitaria de Bellvitge, Barcelona.
Introduction And Objectives: To present our experience with Hydroflex and Dynaflex self-contained inflatable penile prosthesis.
Material And Methods: Between october 1988 and december 2000 a total of 63 men underwent implantation of 8 Hydroflex and 55 Dynaflex penile prosthesis. The follow-up period ranged from 12 and 127 months (mean 54.
J Urol
May 1996
Southwest Impotency Center, Van Buren, Arkansas, USA.
Purpose: We compared our experience with self-contained inflatable and multicomponent prostheses during similar intervals.
Materials And Methods: We followed 295 patients with self-contained prostheses and 1,026 with multicomponent inflatable devices for up to 8 years. Revision rates for mechanical failure, infection or patient dissatisfaction were statistically analyzed.
J Korean Med Sci
December 1995
Department of Urology, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.
The mechanical reliability of AMS hydraulic penile prostheses implanted in 203 patients from April 1985 to June 1995 were evaluated. AMS Hydroflex prosthesis showed the highest incidence of mechanical failure (18.8%; 6/32 patients) during a mean follow-up period of 94.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArch Esp Urol
September 1994
Unidad de Andrología, Hospital de Galdacano, Vizcaya, España.
The aim of this study was to review the current situation of penile prostheses in the treatment of erectile dysfunction and to analyze the indications, degree of acceptability and complications in our experience. From 1987 to 1993, 35 implants were inserted in men suffering from impotence due to different etiologies. The mean age was 54 years and the mean duration of erectile dysfunction was 37 months.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!