Under the theoretical assumption that lexical ambiguity is not a homogeneous phenomenon, but rather that it is subdivided into two distinct types, namely homonymy and polysemy, the present study investigated whether these different types of lexical ambiguity are psychologically real. Four types of ambiguous words, homonymous words (e.g., "pen"), polysemous words with metaphorical extensions (e.g., "eye"), polysemous words with a count/mass metonymic extension (e.g., "turkey"), and polysemous words with a producer/product metonymic extension (e.g., "Dali"), were used in a cross-modal sentence-priming lexical decision task. Overall, the theoretical distinction between homonymy and polysemy was reflected in the results of the present study, which revealed differential processing depending on the type of ambiguity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2518DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lexical ambiguity
12
homonymy polysemy
12
metonymic extension
8
processing lexical
4
ambiguity
4
ambiguity homonymy
4
polysemy mental
4
mental lexicon
4
lexicon theoretical
4
theoretical assumption
4

Similar Publications

Flexibility and Stability in Lexical Tone Recalibration: Evidence from Tone Perceptual Learning.

Lang Speech

December 2024

Leiden University Centre for Linguistics, The Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, The Netherlands.

Listeners adjust their perception of sound categories when confronted with variations in speech. Previous research on speech recalibration has primarily focused on segmental variation, demonstrating that recalibration tends to be specific to individual speakers and situations and often persists over time. In this study, we present findings on the perceptual learning of lexical tone in Standard Chinese, a suprasegmental feature signaled primarily through pitch variations to distinguish morpheme/word meanings.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Readers use recent experiences with word meanings to support the processing of lexical ambiguity: Evidence from eye movements.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn

December 2024

Department of Experimental Psychology, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London.

Fluent reading comprehension demands the rapid access and integration of word meanings. This can be challenging when lexically ambiguous words have less frequent meanings (e.g.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Language serves as a mirror reflecting our understanding of the world and mirrors the world of literature. Pragmatics extends beyond mere literal interpretation, delving into comprehending subtle implications, varying expressions and lexical ambiguities. This deepens our exploration and appreciation of the world of literature.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We investigated how lexical form similarity of referential candidates and ambiguity of following pronouns impact the encoding and retrieval of words from memory during sentence processing in younger and older adults. Critical sentences included two noun phrases (henceforth NPs) that were either phonologically and orthographically similar (Jason and Jacob/Jade) or dissimilar (Jason and Matt/Hannah), followed by a pronoun (e.g.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Homophone (HP) priming occurs when phonologically ambiguous words persistently coactivate their contextually irrelevant meanings. If suppressing those meanings fails, they subliminally bias preferences. Yet, it is unclear if prior findings generalize beyond individual words and to bilingual contexts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!