Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of heparin-coated perfusion circuits with low-dose heparinization and centrifugal pumping compared with the standard method during coronary artery bypass grafting.

Design: Prospective, randomized, single-blind clinical trial.

Setting: A primary care institution.

Patients: Ninety patients who underwent first-time elective coronary artery bypass grafting were eligible for the study. After giving informed consent, they were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups (30/group).

Interventions: Perfusion on regular uncoated bypass equipment with a roller pump and full-dose heparinization (300 IU/kg bolus, activated clotting time [ACT] > 400 s) (group 1), on a heparin-coated oxygenator with a centrifugal pump and full-dose heparinization (group 2) and on fully heparin-coated bypass equipment with a centrifugal pump and low-dose heparinization (100 IU/kg bolus, ACT of 180-400 s) (group 3). Standard coronary artery bypass grafting was performed.

Outcome Measures: Postoperative bleeding, transfusion requirements and clinical outcomes.

Results: There were no complications related to the study protocol. Study groups were similar in terms of postoperative bleeding, transfusion requirements and clinical outcomes.

Conclusions: Heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass with low-dose heparinization and centrifugal pumping is a safe practice but showed no advantages over the use of regular uncoated bypass circuits for coronary bypass surgery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3686945PMC

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

coronary artery
16
artery bypass
16
low-dose heparinization
16
bypass
9
bypass surgery
8
heparin-coated perfusion
8
perfusion circuits
8
circuits low-dose
8
heparinization centrifugal
8
centrifugal pumping
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!