Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: We present our initial experience with laparoscopic ileovesicostomy for managing neurogenic bladder.
Materials And Methods: A 5 port transperitoneal approach was used for laparoscopic ileovesicostomy. After bladder preparation a 17 cm. ileal segment was harvested and used as the urinary conduit. Ileovesical anastomosis was formed using intracorporeal suturing and knot tying techniques.
Results: Operative time was 4 hours. Blood loss was less than 100 ml. Physical activity and oral intake resumed on postoperative day 1 and the patient was discharged home on postoperative day 3. The postoperative narcotic requirement was 4 mg. morphine sulfate equivalent. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications.
Conclusions: Laparoscopic ileovesicostomy in this initial experience was associated with acceptable operative time and minimal postoperative morbidity. It may serve as an excellent minimally invasive alternative to conventional open ileovesicostomy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!