The aim of this study was to evaluate the discomfort associated with CT colonography compared with colonoscopy and bowel purgation cleansing, and to evaluate patient preference between CT colonography and colonoscopy. In a total of 124 patients, scheduled for multidetector virtual CT colonography and diagnostic colonoscopy, patient acceptance and future preference were assessed during the different steps of the procedure (colon preparation, CT examination, and conventional colonoscopy). Patients who described contradictory findings between the degree of discomfort and their preference regarding follow-up examinations were retrospectively reinterviewed regarding the reason for this discrepancy. Colonoscopy was graded slightly more uncomfortable than virtual CT colonography, but the preparation was clearly the most uncomfortable part of the procedure. Concerning their preference regarding follow-up examinations, 71% of the patients preferred virtual CT colonography, 24% preferred colonoscopy, and 5% had no preference. Twenty-eight percent of the patients preferred virtual CT colonography despite that they thought it was equally or even more uncomfortable than colonoscopy. This was mainly due to the faster procedure (17 patients), the lower physical challenge (14 patients), and the lack of sedation (12 patients) of virtual CT colonography. Factors other than the discomfort related to the examinations play an important role in the patient's preference for virtual CT colonography, namely the faster procedure, the lower physical challenge, and the lack of sedation. Since the preparation plays a major decisive factor in the patient acceptance of virtual CT colonography, more attention should be given to fecal tagging.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s003300101082DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

virtual colonography
28
patient acceptance
12
colonography
10
preference follow-up
8
follow-up examinations
8
patients preferred
8
preferred virtual
8
faster procedure
8
lower physical
8
physical challenge
8

Similar Publications

[Colorectal cancer screening with virtual colonography].

Radiologie (Heidelb)

June 2024

Zentrum für Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Clemenshospital und Raphaelsklinik, Münster, Deutschland.

Background: Since 2003, a decline in the age-standardized incidence rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been observed in Germany. Nonetheless, one in eight cancer cases still affects the colon or rectum. The prognosis has improved, with the relative 5‑year survival rate for CRC being approximately 65%.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Computer tomography colonography (CTC) is a non-invasive procedure which has replaced barium enema. CTC uses helical images of a cleansed and gas-distended colon for the diagnosis and treatment of colonic neoplasms. This case study compares 2 patients: one with positive pathology (patient A) and another as comparator (patient B) with a similar pathology to discuss and debate possible treatment pathways.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: This review aims to summarize the different colorectal cancer guidelines for average-risk and high-risk individuals from various countries.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search regarding guidelines, consensus recommendations, or position statements about colorectal cancer screening published within the last 10 years (1 January 2012 to 27 August 2022), was performed at EBSCOhost, JSTOR, PubMed, ProQuest, SAGE, and ScienceDirect.

Results: A total of 18 guidelines were included in this review.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

(1) Although new imaging methods for examining the GIT with high diagnostic capabilities were introduced, the improvement and implementation of safe, efficient, and cost-effective approaches continue, and GIT diseases are still challenging to diagnose; (2) Methods: We aim to show the possibilities of computed tomography (CT) colonography for early diagnosis of colon diseases using a multidetector 32-channel CT scanner after appropriate preparation; (3) Results: After a colonoscopy was performed earlier, 140 patients were examined with CT colonography. Complete colonoscopy was performed in 80 patients (57.1%) out of 140 who underwent CT colonography.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comparison of MiraLAX and magnesium citrate for bowel preparation at CT colonography.

Abdom Radiol (NY)

November 2023

Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave., Madison, WI, 53792-3252, USA.

Purpose: To compare MiraLAX, a hypo-osmotic lavage, and magnesium citrate (MgC), a hyper-osmotic agent for bowel preparation at CTC.

Methods: 398 total screening CTC studies were included in this retrospective, single institution study. 297 underwent preparation with a double-dose MgC regimen (mean age, 61 ± 5.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!