Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies may play a role in the enhancement of platelet aggregation and/or progression of the macrovascular diabetic complications. Also, aCL antibodies may cause or promote ischemia and thrombosis. Therefore, we aimed to investigate IgG aCL and IgM aCL antibodies positivity in type 2 diabetic patients with and without ischemic diabetic foot. In this case-control study, we examined 40 diabetic patients without diabetic foot problem and 35 diabetic patients with ischemic diabetic foot. Forty diabetic patients (19 females, 21 males) without diabetic foot served as Group 1 and 35 diabetic patients (17 females, 18 males) who had ischemic diabetic foot served as Group 2. In the control group, 35 nondiabetic healthy subjects (18 females, 17 males) were included in Group 3. The groups were similar in age and sex, which is not statistically significant (P>.05). There was no difference in the IgG aCL antibodies positivity between Groups 1 and 3 (P>.05). However, IgG aCL antibodies positivity in Group 2 was significantly higher than those of the other groups (P<.05). IgG aCL antibodies were found positive in 10% (4/40) of Group 1, 34.3% (12/35) of Group 2 and 8.6% (3/35) of Group 3. When Groups 1 and 2 were compared, the odds ratio adjusted for age, gender, hypertension, coronary artery disease history, cigarette smoking, duration of diabetes mellitus, cholesterol, and haemoglobin A(1C) (HbA1c) was 6.8 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.41-32.66; P=.016] for aCL positivity. In conclusion, although available evidence does not prove a causal association between positivity of aCL and diabetic foot, we believe that a causal association is supported by the data obtained from this study.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1056-8727(01)00166-0 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!