A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Validity of a new disk grading scale for estimating glaucomatous damage: correlation with visual field damage. | LitMetric

Validity of a new disk grading scale for estimating glaucomatous damage: correlation with visual field damage.

Am J Ophthalmol

The William Anna Goldberg Glaucoma Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107-5598, USA.

Published: June 2002

Purpose: To determine the correlation of a new disk grading system, the disk damage likelihood scale (DDLS), with the visual field damage in patients with glaucoma.

Design: Observational case series.

Methods: Charts of 75 patients (150 eyes) with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), 41 patients (82 eyes) with low-tension glaucoma (LTG), and 25 patients (50 eyes) with pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PXFG) were reviewed retrospectively. DDLS stages and vertical disk sizes were recorded. A masked observer staged the Humphrey field analyzer (program 24-2) visual fields using the Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson (HPA) visual field staging system. Mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD) values were obtained. The correlation of DDLS with the visual field parameters and HPA staging system were evaluated. Findings were assessed by the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients.

Results: In the 282 eyes studied, the DDLS was strongly correlated with both MD (Pearson r = - 0.695, P <.001) and PSD (Pearson r =.703, P <.001). The HPA visual field staging system was also strongly correlated with the DDLS (Spearman r =.711, P <.001). These relationships continued to be significant when the three diagnostic groups (POAG, LTG, PXFG) were evaluated separately (P <.001) and also for small (< 1.5 mm) and average size (1.5-2.0 mm) disks. Large disks (> 2.0 mm) were not evaluated, because there was an insufficient number of cases.

Conclusion: DDLS, a new system for estimating glaucomatous disk damage, strongly correlates with the degree of glaucomatous visual field damage.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01422-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

visual field
16
disk grading
8
field damage
8
ddls visual
8
patients eyes
8
staging system
8
visual
5
field
5
validity disk
4
grading scale
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!