Background: Nonablative subsurface heating is a challenge for medical laser companies. Among the different lasers proposed today, the erbium-glass (Er:glass) laser combined with contact cooling could be an alternative for nonablative remodeling.
Objective: To investigate the risk of side effects according to the quality of cooling and number of pulses.
Methods: A clinical evaluation was performed on 10 patients using an Er:glass laser (1.54 microm) with contact sapphire cooling handpiece (+5 degrees C). Periorbital and perioral areas were treated with a number of pulses increasing gradually from three to eight for a total energy of 24-64 J/cm2. The presence or absence of swelling, crust, blister, and erythema were graded at 7 days. At 3 months postoperatively, hypopigmentation, hyperpigmentation, textural changes, and scars were evaluated clinically.
Results: Periorbital and perioral areas respond differently to the number of pulses defining a "safe" clinical threshold. The periorbital site is very sensitive to dermal heating and efficacy of contact cooling; the anatomic features of this body location may explain these differences.
Conclusion: Selective dermal heating can be achieved with an Er:glass laser coupled with a contact cooling handpiece. The quality of the contact cooling and the number of pulses appear to be important parameters for safety and reproducible clinical results.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.01131.x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!