No evidence that amifostine influences the plasma pharmacokinetics of topotecan in ovarian cancer patients.

Eur J Clin Pharmacol

Department of Medicine and Care, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden.

Published: May 2002

Objective: This aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of topotecan in the presence and absence of preceding amifostine to reduce the risk of side effects in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Methods: Ten patients with advanced ovarian cancer received topotecan, 1.5 mg/m(2) for 5 days, as second-line therapy in an open phase-II study after previous platinum-containing first-line therapy. Patients were randomised to receive intravenous (IV) amifostine at a daily dose of 300 mg/m(2) prior to topotecan in the first cycle and topotecan alone in the second cycle or vice versa. Thereafter all patients were given amifostine and topotecan for additional four cycles. Topotecan was given as a 30-min IV infusion. On day 1 of the first and second treatment cycles, venous blood samples were collected up to 24 h after the start of topotecan infusion. Plasma concentrations of total topotecan and its active lactone form were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography.

Results: There was a rapid decline in total topotecan plasma concentrations after the end of the infusion followed by a slower decay. The initial decline was even faster for the lactone form. The inter-individual variability was pronounced and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) of the total topotecan plasma concentration ranged from 182 nmol/l h to 725 nmol/l h for topotecan alone and from 188 nmol/l h to 574 nmol/l h for topotecan and amifostine. The geometric mean of AUC(0-infinity) values were 326 nmol/l h and 297 nmol/l h, respectively ( P=0.41). In the cycles when the patients received topotecan alone, the plasma AUC of the lactone averaged 40% of the AUC of the total concentration compared with 39% in the cycles when topotecan was given after amifostine. The peak plasma concentration (C(max)) of the lactone averaged 72% of the C(max) of the total topotecan concentration in the topotecan-only group. The corresponding figure after topotecan and amifostine was 80% ( P=0.11). A large intra-individual pharmacokinetic of topotecan between cycles 1 and 2 was also observed.

Conclusion: Amifostine, 300 mg/m(2), does not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of topotecan and there are pronounced intra- and inter-individual variabilities in the topotecan pharmacokinetics.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-002-0434-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

topotecan
20
total topotecan
16
pharmacokinetics topotecan
12
topotecan plasma
12
topotecan amifostine
12
ovarian cancer
8
patients advanced
8
advanced ovarian
8
received topotecan
8
300 mg/m2
8

Similar Publications

Acquired resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs is the primary cause of treatment failure in the clinic. While multiple factors contribute to this resistance, increased expression of ABC transporters-such as P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), and multidrug resistance proteins-play significant roles in the development of resistance to various chemotherapeutics. We found that Erastin, a ferroptosis inducer, was significantly cytotoxic to NCI/ADR-RES, a P-gp-expressing human ovarian cancer cell line.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background/objectives: Despite the numerous advances in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) treatment, GBM remains as the most malignant and aggressive form of brain cancer, characterized by a very poor outcome, highlighting the ongoing need for the development of new therapeutic strategies. A novel intervention using plasma-assisted local delivery of oncology drugs was developed to mediate the drug delivery, which might improve drug uptake and/or chemotherapeutic action. Topotecan (TPT), a water-soluble topoisomerase I inhibitor with major cytotoxic effects during the S-phase of the cell cycle, was selected as the candidate drug because despite its potent antitumor activity, the systemic administration to the brain is limited due to low crossing of the blood-brain barrier.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: Platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) is a major therapeutic challenge, as it responds poorly to standard platinum-based treatment, has limited treatment options, and offers a generally unfavorable prognosis. Chemotherapeutic agents like pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), topotecan (TOPO), and gemcitabine (GEM) are used for this setting, but with varying efficacy and toxicity profiles, leading to an increasing need to understand the optimal balance between treatment effectiveness and tolerability for improving patient outcomes. This study evaluates the efficacy and side effects of PLD, TOPO, and GEM, focusing on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profiles.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Intravitreal and intracameral administration of melphalan and topotecan (TPT) has shown its efficacy in the treatment of retinoblastoma over the last few years. Due to rapid hydrolysis, melphalan must be administered within the hour following reconstitution. With improved stability at room temperature and reduced ocular toxicity, TPT seems to be a promising candidate for production of prefilled syringes in terms of safety and efficiency of preparation and treatment administration.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Doxorubicin and topotecan resistance in ovarian cancer: Gene expression and microenvironment analysis in 2D and 3D models.

Biomed Pharmacother

January 2025

Institute of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum, University of Zielona Góra, Zyty 28 St., Zielona Góra 65-046, Poland. Electronic address:

This study explores the mechanisms underlying chemotherapy resistance in ovarian cancer (OC) using doxorubicin (DOX) and topotecan (TOP)-resistant cell lines derived from the drug-sensitive A2780 ovarian cancer cell line. Both two-dimensional (2D) monolayer cell cultures and three-dimensional (3D) spheroid models were employed to examine the differential drug responses in these environments. The results revealed that 3D spheroids demonstrated significantly higher resistance to DOX and TOP than 2D cultures, suggesting a closer mimicry of in vivo tumour conditions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!