A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[The assessment of subjective distress related to hyperacusis with a self-rating questionnaire on hypersensitivity to sound]. | LitMetric

Background: So far there has been no adequate measure to assess or illustrate, in terms of different levels, subjective distress related to hypersensitivity to sound.

Method And Patients: The here presented work describes and discusses the construction of a questionnaire to assess subjective distress related to hypersensitivity to sound (GUF). Between May and September 2000 226 patients that experienced suffering from hypersensitivity to sound as well as from chronic tinnitus, completed a first version of the questionnaire on admittance to the hospital. Of these patients 27.9 % were out-patients and 72.1 % were in-patients. In addition, the in-patients completed the questionnaire again during their last week of treatment. The 27 items of the GUF were interpreted by factor analysis to explore and determine the structure of the questionnaire; the number of items was reduced under the aspects of consistency and reliability. Finally, the revised version of the GUF underwent a first validation.

Results: The factor analysis shows three factors explaining 50.65 % variance (factor 1 [KRH], cognitive reactions to hyperacusis; factor 2 [ASV], actional/somatic behaviour; factor 3 [ERG], emotional reaction to external noises). First attempts to validate the questionnaire are promising; it appears that the GUF is also sensitive to therapy effects.

Conclusions: The here presented questionnaire is suitable for identifying distinct levels of subjective distress related to hypersensitivity to sound. Thus, for the first time, there is an adequate measure for assessment available. Furthermore, results of part of the sample show that the GUF is also suitable for therapy evaluation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-28342DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

subjective distress
16
distress hypersensitivity
12
hypersensitivity sound
12
adequate measure
8
levels subjective
8
factor analysis
8
questionnaire
7
hypersensitivity
5
guf
5
factor
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!