Background: In individual studies and limited meta-analyses venlafaxine has been reported to be more effective than comparator antidepressants, particularly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).

Aims: To perform a systematic review of all such studies.

Method: We conducted a systematic review of double-blind, randomised trials comparing venlafaxine with alternative antidepressants in the treatment of depression. The primary outcome was the difference in final depression rating scale value, expressed as a standardised effect size. Secondary outcomes were response rate, remission rate and tolerability.

Results: A total of 32 randomised trials were included. Venlafaxine was more effective than other antidepressants (standardised effect size was -0.14, 95% Cl -0.07 to -0.22). A similar significant advantage was found against SSRIs (20 studies) but not tricyclic antidepressants (7 studies).

Conclusions: Venlafaxine has greater efficacy than SSRIs although there is uncertainty in comparison with other antidepressants. Further studies are required to determine the clinical importance of this finding.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.180.5.396DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

selective serotonin
8
serotonin reuptake
8
reuptake inhibitors
8
systematic review
8
randomised trials
8
standardised size
8
antidepressants
6
venlafaxine
5
efficacy tolerability
4
tolerability venlafaxine
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!