The laboratory analyses of 404 participants of the health study GUNDULA, 201 men and 203 women between 30 and 80 years old, were performed to evaluate the variables for the determination of biological age. From the more than 70 laboratory variables resulting from clinical-chemical and hematologic tests and from urinalysis, less than 40 are significantly age-dependent. About half of these variables were examined by regression analysis to evaluate whether they are useful for the estimation of biological age by a laboratory index. Considerable sex differences were observed. The laboratory indexes for the participants altogether (resulting from 13 parameters) and separated for women (10 parameters) and men (8 parameters) show more variations than the biological age estimated by non-invasive parameters. In men only, there exists a significant but inverse correlation between laboratory index and relative aging rate, the difference between biological and chronological age. The results of some striking variables (e.g. dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate and others) and the results of an explorative factor analysis with regard to possible interconnections between variables and chronological age will be discussed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s003910200001 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!