Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
This study compared sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR) of four previously published sets of electrodiagnostic criteria for demyelination in 64 patients whose history and physical examination indicated that chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy was a possible diagnosis. Sensitivity of the sets of criteria ranged from 56-70 % and specificity from 85-98 %. Positive LRs ranged from 4.67-28 and negative LR's from 0.35-0.45. The results showed that one set of electrodiagnostic criteria was considerably more helpful than the other three in establishing the diagnosis CIDP. If, however, the test results of the sets were not consistent with demyelination, the effect of the negative test results on the probability of the diagnosis CIDP was similar for all four sets.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004150200029 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!