The Medicaid managed care grievance process: new protections for beneficiaries.

Healthc Financ Manage

Office of Inspector General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, San Francisco, California, USA.

Published: April 2002

AI Article Synopsis

  • The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has proposed new regulations to strengthen the rights of Medicaid managed care enrollees regarding their ability to appeal decisions made by their plans.
  • These regulations will require both internal and external grievance processes, which may impact managed care organizations that operate across multiple states.
  • Developing a standardized grievance process across all services can save money, reduce confusion, and contribute to quality improvements by providing valuable data for healthcare providers.

Article Abstract

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) recently proposed regulations to enhance protection of the rights of Medicaid managed care enrollees to appeal decisions made by their managed care plans. The regulations would require both internal and external beneficiary grievance processes that could have a significant effect on managed care organizations with multiple lines of business operating in several states. Managed care organizations may find it worthwhile to develop a standard grievance process that meets Medicaid and Medicare requirements and can be used by enrollees in commercial plans. In addition to saving money and reducing confusion, a well-structured internal grievance process for all product lines would be useful as part of a quality-improvement initiative. Data from grievances may provide information that can help healthcare providers update medical protocols.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

managed care
20
grievance process
12
medicaid managed
8
care organizations
8
care
5
medicaid
4
grievance
4
care grievance
4
process protections
4
protections beneficiaries
4

Similar Publications

Abdominal ectopic pregnancy is a rare type of ectopic pregnancy associated with high maternal and perinatal mortality. We present a case of a 28-year-old now primipara who was misdiagnosed to have abruptio placentae and ruptured uterus on two different occasions from a primary health care center but was found to have an advanced abdominal ectopic gestation at 21 weeks gestational age. The patient was managed by exploratory laparotomy and is currently doing well.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is dependent on the diagnostic criteria used and there is no consensus on screening methods and diagnostic criteria. The International Association for Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) recently put forward new diagnostic criteria and encourages its adoption worldwide. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of GDM and to compare the foeto-maternal outcomes of women diagnosed with GDM in the Federal Medical Centre, Yenagoa using the WHO 1999 and IADPSG criteria.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Primary care offers an entry point into the health care system for adolescents experiencing mental illnesses. This study explored the perceptions of adolescents with an anxiety or mood disorder accessing primary care for mental health services.

Methods: Qualitative interpretive descriptive design was employed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Triangular Margin: Reliable Imaging Feature of Fibrous Dysplasia in Long Bones?

J Comput Assist Tomogr

January 2025

Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

Objective: To determine the utility of a triangular margin as an imaging diagnostic feature for fibrous dysplasia.

Materials And Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all surgically biopsied or managed benign and malignant bone tumors by a single orthopedic oncologist over 19 years (2003 to 2022). A musculoskeletal radiologist and an orthopedic oncologist, both with >10 years of experience, retrospectively evaluated all imaging in consensus.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Tarlatamab is a bispecific T-cell engager immunotherapy targeting delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) and the cluster of differentiation 3 (CD3) molecule. In the phase 2 DeLLphi-301 trial of tarlatamab for patients with previously treated small cell lung cancer, tarlatamab 10 mg every 2 weeks achieved durable responses and encouraging survival outcomes. Analyses of updated safety data from the DeLLphi-301 trial demonstrated that the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were cytokine release syndrome (53%), pyrexia (38%), decreased appetite (36%), dysgeusia (32%), and an emia (30%).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!