Background: As the health care economic-evaluation literature continues to grow, a need for sound methods to conduct systematic reviews of the existing evidence is emerging. So far, reviews of economic evaluations have relied upon noncomprehensive sources and have adopted simplistic search methods, both likely to lead to biased results.
Objective: To provide evidence of the performance of alternative approaches for identifying published health care economic evaluations and to illustrate what forms of bias may affect systematic reviews of such studies.
Methods: The sensitivity and specificity of alternative search strategies were tested for the period January to March 1997, using seven major medical and social science literature databases, one economic evaluation database and a published bibliography. Studies were selected blindly by pairs of reviewers (agreement 94.1%-96.5%), using a two-stage procedure.
Results: By limiting the scope of a review to Medline and by using appropriate search strategies, researchers may significantly reduce the number of nonrelevant references retrieved by their electronic searches (sensitivity 72%, specificity 75%, compared with more extensive strategies), which require exclusion by manual screening. The yield of searches based on specialized bibliographies and databases may be different because of variations in selection criteria, coverage and time lag for inclusion of references.
Conclusions: Medline is the key source for reviews of economic evaluations. Researchers may select from the search strategies proposed in this paper the one that offers an optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity in relation to the aims of their review. Manual searches and searches of databases other than Medline have a limited incremental yield. The sensitivity of all search strategies increases when tighter methodological standards are set, but more research is needed on methods for identifying methodologically sound studies.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200205000-00004 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Assessing the Effectiveness of Interactive Robot-Assisted Virtual Health Coaching for Health Literacy and Disease Knowledge of Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: Quasiexperimental Study.
J Med Internet Res
January 2025
Department of Health Promotion and Health Education, College of Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) imposes a significant global health and economic burden, impacting millions globally. Despite its high prevalence, public awareness and understanding of CKD remain limited, leading to delayed diagnosis and suboptimal management. Traditional patient education methods, such as 1-on-1 verbal instruction or printed brochures, are often insufficient, especially considering the shortage of nursing staff.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFImpact of American College of surgeons trauma verification on statewide collaborative outcomes.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg
January 2025
From the Department of Surgery (E.M., L.G., J.S.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Georgia Trauma Commission (E.A., G.S.), Madison; Wellstar Medical College of Georgia, (R.M.) Medical College of Georgia Augusta University, Augusta; Grady Health System (S.T.), Atlanta; Memorial Health University Medical Center (J.D.), Savannah; Department of Surgery (D.A.), Atrium Health Navicent, Macon, Georgia.
Background: American College of Surgeons (ACS) trauma center verification has demonstrated improved outcomes at individual centers, but its impact on statewide Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) Collaboratives is unknown. A statewide TQIP Collaborative, founded in 2011, noted underperformance in six of eight patient cohorts identified in the TQIP Collaborative report. We hypothesized that requiring ACS verification for level I and II trauma centers would result in improved outcomes for the state collaborative.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe Screening Tomosynthesis Trial with Advanced Reader Methods (STREAM): design and rationale of a population-based breast cancer screening trial.
Eur Radiol
January 2025
Radboud University Medical Center, IQ Health science department, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Objectives: It is uncertain what the effects of introducing digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme would be on detection, recall, and interval cancers (ICs), while reading times are expected to increase. Therefore, an investigation into the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of DBT screening while optimising reading is required.
Materials And Methods: The Screening Tomosynthesis trial with advanced REAding Methods (STREAM) aims to include 17,275 women (age 50-72 years) eligible for breast cancer screening in the Netherlands for two biennial DBT screening rounds to determine the short-, medium-, and long-term effects and acceptability of DBT screening and identify an optimised strategy for reading DBT.
Public Health.
Alzheimers Dement
December 2024
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Background: The value payers and policymakers traditionally place on novel treatments for Alzheimer's and other neurological diseases that cause cognitive impairment (CI) and dementia often ignores disease baseline severity. More patient-centered economic evaluations-such as those estimating "insurance value"-incorporate the fact that individuals are typically risk-averse and place high value on generous coverage of treatments in the event that they develop CI, such as severe dementia, later in life. This study aims to estimate this insurance value, accounting for risk aversion, relative to the value of the same treatment based on traditional payer cost effectiveness approaches.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPublic Health.
Alzheimers Dement
December 2024
National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Aichi, Japan.
Background: This post-hoc subgroup analysis aimed to estimate the potential cost-effectiveness of a Japanese multimodal intervention trial for the prevention of dementia (J-MINT) from a societal perspective.
Method: Using a Markov model, we estimated the economic impact of J-MINT on disease prevention, drawing on data from the 2019 J-MINT trial and relevant published literature. The trial, a randomized controlled trial (RCT), focused on participants aged 65 to 85 years with mild cognitive impairment.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!