Background: Clinical studies have demonstrated that esomeprazole is superior to omeprazole for the acute treatment of reflux oesophagitis.
Objective: To compare the cost effectiveness of esomeprazole 40mg once daily with omeprazole 20mg once daily in patients with reflux oesophagitis.
Methods: Pooled data were used from three 8-week clinical trials comparing the efficacy and safety of esomeprazole 40mg once daily and omeprazole 20mg once daily for the acute treatment of reflux oesophagitis. A simple decision analysis model, using UK direct medical costs, compared the cost effectiveness of the two treatments. Healing probabilities derived from the clinical studies using the Life Table method were used to estimate the effectiveness and cost of treating 100 patients with reflux oesophagitis. Patient management assumptions were based on a clinical management survey involving 25 UK physicians.
Perspective: UK National Health Service.
Results: After 4 weeks' therapy, the Life Table estimated the oesophageal healing rate to be 77.7% in esomeprazole 40mg once-daily recipients (n = 2446), compared with 67.6% in omeprazole 20mg once-daily recipients (n = 2431; p < 0.001). The corresponding values after 8 weeks' treatment were 93.4% and 86.2%, respectively (p < 0.001). The model predicted that when considering healing probabilities over 8 weeks, esomeprazole 40mg once daily produced total direct cost savings of pound1290 (14%) when compared with omeprazole 20mg once daily. When considering the cost of treating patients who had failed treatment (defined as patient not healed as assessed by endoscopy) after 8 weeks, the cost advantage for esomeprazole was even greater.
Conclusion: Esomeprazole 40mg once daily is cost effective compared with omeprazole 20mg once daily in the acute treatment of patients with reflux oesophagitis; esomeprazole provides greater effectiveness at a lower cost.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200220040-00006 | DOI Listing |
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
November 2024
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, 23 Kyungheedae-Ro, Dongdaemun-Gu, Seoul, 02447, Korea.
Purpose: Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is mainly treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) such as esomeprazole, which have shortcomings like delayed absorption and increased osteoporosis. Fexuprazan is a novel potent potassium-competitive acid blocker that inhibits gastric acid secretion with rapid onset and long duration of action. To assess the efficacy and safety of fexuprazan compared to esomeprazole in patients with LPRD.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeurogastroenterol Motil
January 2023
Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Background: Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are cornerstone treatments for gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, evidence suggests that most patients exhibit partial response to PPIs, suggesting the need for novel therapies that can provide an improved and sustained increase in gastric pH.
Aims: This study aimed to determine the effect of vonoprazan, a novel, orally active small-molecule potassium-competitive acid blocker, versus esomeprazole, a PPI, in preventing heartburn symptoms over a 4-week treatment period in patients with GERD and a partial response to esomeprazole treatment.
Methods: This randomized, double-blind, proof-of-concept, phase 2 clinical trial was conducted between 2016 and 2018 at 39 sites across Europe and designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan 20 mg once daily (q.
Drug Des Devel Ther
April 2022
Department of Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, 41944, Republic of Korea.
Background: YYD601 was developed as a novel dual delayed release (DDR) formulation of esomeprazole to prolong the plasma esomeprazole concentration and extend the duration of acid suppression.
Purpose: The pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) characteristics of YYD601 after single and multiple oral administrations were investigated in healthy Korean adults under fasting and fed conditions, and compared with the original esomeprazole capsule.
Methods: In the single-center, randomized, open-label, parallel-design, two-period study, thirty two volunteers were enrolled into four dosing groups, including esomeprazole 40-mg (group A), YYD60130-mg (group B), YYD601 40-mg (group C), and YYD601 60-mg (group D) once daily for 5 days.
Purpose: The objective of this study was to improve the predictive performance of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 substrates in Japanese subjects using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling.
Materials And Methods: Esomeprazole, a CYP2C19 substrate, was selected as a test compound, and the Simcyp simulator was used for pharmacokinetic prediction. The compound file of esomeprazole model developed in healthy Caucasian subjects was applied directly.
Drug Des Devel Ther
February 2020
Division of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Research comparing the clinical efficacy of dexlansoprazole and esomeprazole has been limited. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of single doses of dexlansoprazole (modified-release 60 mg) and esomeprazole (40 mg) after 24-week follow-up in patients with mild erosive esophagitis. We enrolled 86 adult GERD subjects, randomized in a 1:1 ratio to two sequence groups defining the order in which they received single doses of dexlansoprazole (n=43) and esomeprazole (n=43) for 8 weeks as initial treatment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!