The main reason to determine estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR) in breast cancer is their predictive value for the response to endocrine therapy. In addition, ER and PR are often used as prognostic indicators. Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and immunocytochemical assay (ICA) are two methods for determining ER and PR. These two methods have not been compared with each other in relation to clinical endpoints. In the present study we prospectively evaluated the prognostic value of ER and PR as determined by ICA and EIA in 223 and 207 patients, respectively, with early breast cancer. ER was positive in approximately 77% of patients, while PR was positive in approximately 65% of patients. The proportion of potential agreement beyond chance between EIA and ICA was 0.58 and 0.65 for ER and PR, respectively. The median follow-up was 86 months. Both ER and PR appeared to be weak prognostic factors. There were no differences in prognostic value according to the time point of analysis or cutoff value chosen, nor were there any differences in the prognostic value of hormone receptors detected by ICA or EIA. Both methods appear to be equivalent in terms of qualification and prognostic value.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/172460080201700103 | DOI Listing |
Eur J Med Chem
January 2025
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Targeted Tracer Research and Development Laboratory, Institute of Respiratory Healthand, Department of Frontiers Science Center for Disease-related Molecular Network, Core Facilities, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. Electronic address:
NEK2, a serine/threonine protein kinase, is integral to mitotic events such as centrosome duplication and separation, microtubule stabilization, spindle assembly checkpoint, and kinetochore attachment. However, NEK2 overexpression leads to centrosome amplification and chromosomal instability, which are significantly associated with various malignancies, including liver, breast, and non-small cell lung cancer. This overexpression could facilitate tumor development and confer resistance to therapy by promoting aberrant cell division and centrosome amplification.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGac Med Mex
January 2025
División de Medicina Molecular, Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Occidente, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Guadalajara.
Background: The usefulness of circulating free DNA (cfDNA), nuclear DNA (nDNA) and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) as potential biomarkers in cancer remains controversial.
Objective: To determine the concentration of cfDNA and plasma nDNA and mtDNA levels in breast cancer (BC) patients.
Material And Methods: This study included a total of 86 women (69 patients with BC and 17 women as a control group).
Neoplasma
December 2024
Department of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
MTHFD2 is highly overexpressed in breast cancer tissues, indicating that it might be used as a target in breast cancer treatment. This study aims to determine the role of MTHFD2 in breast cancer cell proliferation and the molecular pathways involved. In order to investigate MTHFD2 gene expression and its downstream pathways in breast cancer, we started our inquiry with a bioinformatics analysis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeoplasma
December 2024
Department of Breast Center, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly aggressive subtype of breast malignancy. Although some patients benefit from immune checkpoint therapy, current treatment methods rely mainly on chemotherapy. It is imperative to develop predictors of efficacy and identify individuals who will be sensitive to particular treatment regimens.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIr J Med Sci
January 2025
Department of Breast Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, D04 T6F4, Ireland.
Background: CT thorax, abdomen and pelvis (CT-TAP) remains the standard in the identification of metastatic disease in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. In patients with proven micro and macro axillary nodal metastasis, the optimal radiological technique remains controversial. A consensus on which patients with axillary nodal disease should receive radiological staging for distant disease and how this should be performed is not currently available.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!