A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Hepatic tumors treated with percutaneous radio-frequency ablation: CT and MR imaging follow-up. | LitMetric

Hepatic tumors treated with percutaneous radio-frequency ablation: CT and MR imaging follow-up.

Radiology

Department of Radiology, Institut Gustave-Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, France.

Published: April 2002

Purpose: To describe the appearance of hepatic tumors treated with radio-frequency (RF) ablation on computed tomographic (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) images and the pattern of residual tumor at the site of RF ablation and to assess prospectively the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive CT and MR imaging values in the evaluation of RF treatment.

Materials And Methods: Thirty-one patients with 50 tumors (nine hepatocellular carcinomas and 41 metastases) treated with RF ablation underwent CT and MR imaging on the same day at 2, 4, and 6 months; CT was performed every 3 months thereafter. CT and MR findings were interpreted separately and prospectively by two reviewers with consensus. For both imaging techniques, appearance of the treated area, treatment efficacy, and complications were assessed at each time. Sensitivity and specificity were determined by using the McNemar test.

Results: After a mean follow-up of 19 months, nine tumors showed local regrowth. At 2 months, MR imaging depicted more local regrowths (eight of nine; sensitivity, 89%) than did CT (four of nine; sensitivity, 44%) but without significant differences (P =.12). In two cases, only T2-weighted imaging depicted local regrowth. All nine lesions became conspicuous at 4-month follow-up with both techniques. At 2 months, thin peripheral rim enhancement and arterioportal shunting were found in 24% and 12%, respectively, of the treated tumors. These findings disappeared thereafter and are not linked to tumor regrowth.

Conclusion: Despite the small number of patients, CT and MR imaging may depicted all local regrowth at 4 months or sooner. MR imaging may have an edge over CT in the early detection of local regrowth.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2231010780DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

local regrowth
16
imaging depicted
12
depicted local
12
hepatic tumors
8
tumors treated
8
radio-frequency ablation
8
imaging
8
sensitivity specificity
8
regrowth months
8
months
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!