Comparison of 2-dimensional echocardiography and myocardial perfusion imaging for diagnosing myocardial infarction in emergency department patients.

Background: Both 2-dimensional echocardiography and myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with technetium-99m based agents have been used to identify patients in the emergency department with myocardial infarction (MI). However, the inclusion of small numbers of patients in prior studies limits the accurate assessment of sensitivity of the 2 techniques.

Methods: Gated MPI was used as part of the initial triage process in patients initially considered at low to moderate risk for acute coronary syndromes (no ST elevation or depression). Patients diagnosed with MI also underwent echocardiography. MPI results were considered positive if there was a perfusion defect associated with abnormal wall motion or thickening, and echocardiographic results were considered positive if there were segmental wall motion abnormalities or ejection fraction of less than 40%.

Results: Both tests were performed on 141 patients. The sensitivities for MI for echocardiography (91%; 95% CI, 86%-95%) and MPI (89%; 95% CI, 83%-94%) were similar. Patients who had either negative echocardiographic results (peak creatine kinase level [CK], 325 +/- 206 vs 582 +/- 614 U/L; P =.003) or negative MPI results (peak CK, 313 +/- 227 vs 590 +/- 620 U/L; P =.001) had smaller MIs as estimated with peak CK values. Ejection fraction was highly correlated between the 2 techniques (r = 0.82; P <.001).

Conclusion: Both echocardiography and MPI have a high sensitivity for identifying patients in the emergency department who have MI. False negative studies with either technique were associated with small MIs.