Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The determination of a genetic basis for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) depends on how phenotypic boundaries are defined. Although a hypothesis for serotonin dysfunction in OCD has been advanced, no genes specifically responsible for serotonin regulation have as yet been definitively related to the etiology of OCD. The phenotypic variability of OCD could be at the basis of the failure of molecular biology investigations to find any genes involved in the liability to the disorder. Obsessive and compulsive contents can aggregate in OCD patients differently; multifactorial description may therefore be able to account for OCD phenotypic variance. Using principal component analysis, we derived five factors from 13 main contents of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS), and considered them as quantitative phenotypes to evaluate their possible association with an insertion/deletion polymorphism in the promoter region of the serotonin transporter gene (5-HTTLPR). A trend toward positive association between the fifth factor, including counting and repeating rituals, and 5-HTTLPR was found. However, only considering the subgroup of patients with tic codiagnosis, we found a significantly higher score for the fifth factor for patients with L/L genotype with respect to L/S and S/S genotypes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.1700 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!