In this review, a series of traditional morphology-based measurements, relatively well-documented ancillary biomarkers, and emerging molecular assays are evaluated for their relative ability to predict prognosis in prostate cancer. Prognostic factors that have achieved widespread use and are classified as category I by the College of American Pathologists' Solid Tumor Prognostic Factor Consensus Conference are compared with newer tests that are beginning to be used in clinical practice (category II) and emerging molecular-based assays that have yet to be widely validated in the published literature or in clinical trials (category III).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00125480-200203000-00003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prostate cancer
8
morphologic molecular
4
molecular prognostic
4
prognostic markers
4
markers prostate
4
cancer review
4
review series
4
series traditional
4
traditional morphology-based
4
morphology-based measurements
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!