Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The aim of this study was to determine the adherence of Staphylococcus epidermidis to intraocular lenses made of five different biomaterials: polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), heparinized PMMA, silicone, hydrophilic acrylic, and hydrogel. The extent of bacterial binding was measured by counting. The results were compared using a one-factor variance analysis. Adherence was weakest on hydrogel and strongest on the silicone polymer. Bacterial adherence to the implant surface must therefore depend on the hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity of the biomaterial.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/ddc-120001490 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!