Purpose: Capecitabine and oxaliplatin are both active anticancer agents in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC). The aim of this dose-finding trial was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the activity of the combination in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Patients And Methods: Twenty-five chemotherapy-pretreated patients received the combination of capecitabine and oxaliplatin. Capecitabine was administered orally twice a day continuously for 14 days in doses ranging from 1,650 to 2,500 mg/m2/d, and oxaliplatin was administered as a two-hour infusion on day 1 using dose, ranges from 100 to 130 mg/m2 repeated every three weeks.
Results: Twenty-five patients were assessable for toxicity, and DLTs were diarrhea (grade > or = 3: 27%) and stomatitis (grade > or = 3: 9%) at dose level VI. Dose level V (capecitabine 2500 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 120 mg/m2) was found to be the MTD. Hematological toxicity was minimal, overall neurotoxicity (grade 1-4) was 27% with 1% grade 3-4. A global response rate was 17% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 2%-32%) and the median overall survival was 12 months.
Conclusion: The recommended dose for further phase II studies is capecitabine 2,500 mg/m2/d with intermittent schedule and oxaliplatin 120 mg/m2 every three weeks. The toxicities were mainly gastrointestinal: diarrhea, stomatitis and vomiting. This combination should be studied in phase II trials in advanced colorectal.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1013562914125 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer patients: a retrospective, comparative study.
World J Surg Oncol
January 2025
Colorectal Surgery Department, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University/ Hunan Cancer Hospital, No. 283 Tongzipo Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, Hunan, 410013, China.
Objective: The clinical benefits of neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer patients are controversial. This study intended to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in these patients.
Methods: In this retrospective study, 71 locally advanced gastric cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone were divided into bevacizumab plus chemo group (N = 23) and chemo group (N = 48).
Purpose: Although surgery is the most effective treatment for rectal prolapse, a risk of recurrence reported in literature is 6-27%. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the abdominal and perineal approach for surgical treatment of recurrent external rectal prolapse.
Methods: A systematic search of PubMed and Embase was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.
Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab in microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer (CheckMate 8HW): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.
Lancet
January 2025
Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Background: CheckMate 8HW prespecified dual primary endpoints, assessed in patients with centrally confirmed microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient status: progression-free survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab compared with chemotherapy as first-line therapy and progression-free survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab compared with nivolumab alone, regardless of previous systemic treatment for metastatic disease. In our previous report, nivolumab plus ipilimumab showed superior progression-free survival versus chemotherapy in first-line microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer in the CheckMate 8HW trial. Here, we report results from the prespecified interim analysis for the other primary endpoint of progression-free survival for nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab across all treatment lines.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPredictive Value of Magnetic Resonance Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer.
J Surg Res
January 2025
Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; S-SPIRE Center, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Introduction: Previous research has demonstrated that after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer, the sensitivity of magnetic resonance complete response (mrCR) for detecting pathologic complete response (pCR) in the surgical specimen ranges from 74 to 94%. Patient and provider interest in nonoperative management of rectal cancer that responds favorably to neoadjuvant therapy has grown, necessitating stronger evidence for how well radiographic complete response truly predicts pCR. We sought to determine the current association between mrCR and pCR in locally advanced rectal cancer.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPrognostic significance of the retroperitoneal surgical resection margin on computed tomography colonography in retroperitonealized colon cancer.
Surgery
January 2025
Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address:
Background: A positive pathologic retroperitoneal surgical resection margin in the retroperitonealized colon is reported to predict distant metastases. However, no studies have investigated retroperitoneal surgical resection margin positivity on computed tomography colonography and its prognostic significance.
Methods: Patients who underwent primary resection for ascending or descending colon cancer at our institution between 2013 and 2018 were retrospectively evaluated (n = 206).
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!