Purpose: Little is known about physicians' triage decisions for patients with chest pain in the emergency department. We sought to understand better the variability and accuracy of physicians' triage decisions.

Subjects And Methods: We used 20 simulated cases to compare triage decisions by 147 physicians (46 emergency medicine, 87 internal medicine, and 14 cardiology physicians) with triage decisions recommended by a previously validated prediction rule. We calculated triage sensitivity and specificity using the prediction rule to estimate the likelihood that each of the simulated patients would suffer a major complication. Triage sensitivity was defined as the proportion of all patients expected to have major complications who were triaged to the coronary care or inpatient telemetry unit.

Results: Triage specificity was defined as the proportion of all patients without complications who were triaged to sites other than the coronary care or inpatient telemetry unit.Physicians' triage decisions were less sensitive (85% vs. 96%, P <0.001) and less specific (38% vs. 41%, P = 0.02) than decisions recommended by the prediction rule. Physicians overestimated patients' risk of complications and triaged more patients to inpatient monitored beds. Despite their preference for inpatient monitored beds, physicians' decisions would have resulted in four times as many major complications in patients who were not triaged to inpatient monitored beds, compared with decisions recommended by the prediction rule (2.4% vs. 0.6%, P <0.001). Although physicians' decisions were best explained by their provisional diagnoses, interphysician agreement about triage decisions (kappa = 0.34) and diagnosis (kappa = 0.31) was only fair.

Conclusions: In simulated cases, physicians' triage decisions varied widely and their predictions of patient outcomes differed markedly from that of the validated prediction rule, suggesting that use of the prediction rule in the emergency department could improve physicians' decisions and patients' outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9343(01)01054-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

triage decisions
16
triage
9
patients chest
8
chest pain
8
pain emergency
8
emergency department
8
physicians' triage
8
prediction rule
8
triage sensitivity
8
defined proportion
8

Similar Publications

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has led governments worldwide to make ethically controversial decisions. As a result, healthcare professionals are facing several ethical dilemmas, especially in terms of healthcare services provided to senior citizens. Thus, the aim of this review is to identify and categorize ethical dilemmas as well as propose solutions regarding health care services for elderly individuals.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Accuracy of teledentistry versus clinical oral examination for aged-care home residents: A pilot study.

J Frailty Aging

February 2025

Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. Electronic address:

Objectives: The aim of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of using the mobile photographic method (m-health) of teledentistry for oral screening and triaging of older patients living in aged care homes.

Methods: The study took place in 2023 in four aged care facilities in Egypt. Three trained dentists performed clinical oral examinations of the participants and filled in the World Health Organization (WHO) oral health assessment form.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A Data-driven Approach to Selecting Pulmonary and Critical Care Fellows for Interviews.

ATS Sch

January 2025

Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Emory University Department of Medicine, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

Training programs around the country receive many applications every year with a limited time window to send out invitations for interviews. This poses major barriers to conducting holistic application reviews. To create and implement a data-driven selection process that promotes holistic reviews within a tight timeline to select applicants for invitation to interview.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Construction and evaluation of a triage assessment model for patients with acute non-traumatic chest pain: mixed retrospective and prospective observational study.

BMC Emerg Med

January 2025

Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Department of Emergency, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Emergency Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.

Background: Acute non-traumatic chest pain is one of the common complaints in the emergency department and is closely associated with fatal disease. Triage assessment urgently requires the use of simple, rapid tools to screen patients with chest pain for high-risk condition to improve patient outcomes.

Methods: After data preprocessing and feature selection, univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to identify potential predictors associated with acute non-traumatic chest pain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Traumatic injuries are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, with a disproportionate impact on populations in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The Kampala Trauma Score (KTS) is frequently used for triage in these settings, though its predictive accuracy remains under debate. This study evaluates the effectiveness of machine learning (ML) models in predicting triage decisions and compares their performance to the KTS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!